I am just doing some practice from one of my books, and I was curious about why I am getting the following error in eclipse:
Type mismatch: cannot convert from type DoublyLinkedList.Node<E> to DoublyLinkedList.Node<E>
Code:
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.ListIterator;
import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
public class DoublyLinkedList<E extends Comparable<E>> implements Iterable<E>{
private int size = 0;
private Node<E> head;
private Node<E> tail;
/** Returns a list iterator object for the list at
* the specified index
*/
public DoublyLinkedList(){
}
private static class Node<E> {
Node<E> next = null;
Node<E> prev = null;
E data;
public Node(E dataItem){
data = dataItem;
}
public Node(E dataItem, Node<E> previous, Node<E> nextNode){
this(dataItem);
prev = previous;
next = nextNode;
}
}
private class MyListIter<E> implements ListIterator<E>{
private Node<E> lastReturned; // a link reference to the last item that was returned
private Node<E> nextItem; // a link reference to the next item in the list
/** The index of the current position */
private int index = 0;
public MyListIter(int pos){
if (pos < 0 || pos > size)
throw new IndexOutOfBoundsException("Invalid index: " + index);
lastReturned = null;
if (pos == size){
index = size;
nextItem = null;
} else { // otherwise we will start at the beginning of the list, and loop until the position in the argument
nextItem = head; // ERROR
for (index = 0; index < pos; index++){
nextItem = nextItem.next; // next item will always reference the list node that is called by the next method
}
}
}
@Override
public void add(E element) {
if (head == null){
Node<E> newNode = new Node<E>(element);
head = newNode; // ERROR
tail = head;
}
}
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return nextItem != null; // just checks to make sure there is a node following the current node
}
@Override
public boolean hasPrevious() {
return (nextItem == null && size != 0) || nextItem.prev != null;
}
@Override
public E next() {
if (!hasNext())
throw new NoSuchElementException("There is no node at that location");
lastReturned = nextItem;
nextItem = nextItem.next;
index++;
return lastReturned.data;
}
@Override
public int nextIndex() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return 0;
}
@Override
public E previous() {
if (!hasPrevious())
throw new NoSuchElementException();
if (nextItem == null) // the iterator is at the end of the list
nextItem = tail; // therefore, the nextItem is at the tail, so the previous is the tail. ERROR HERE TOO
else
nextItem = nextItem.prev;
lastReturned = nextItem;
index--;
return lastReturned.data;
}
@Override
public int previousIndex() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return 0;
}
@Override
public void remove() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
}
@Override
public void set(E arg0) {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
}
}
@Override
public Iterator<E> iterator() {
// TODO Auto-generated method stub
return null;
}
}
I commented where exactly I am getting the error in 3 different locations. If you can provide any feedbac开发者_运维知识库k, I'd appreciate it. My book doesn't address it and I have searched around and can't really seem to get the answer i'm looking for.
You've declared two different generic types: E
(for Node
) and E extends Comparable<E>
(for DoublyLinkedList
).
The main issue here is probably MyListIter
, which is a non-static inner class and as such automatically inherits DoublyLinkedList
's definition of E
. Because it inherits the definition of E
, you should just be declaring it as
private class MyListIter implements ListIterator<E>
but you've made it MyListIter<E>
, which is redefining E
to something different than the E
that DoublyLinkedList
users (implicit E extends Object
vs. E extends Comparable<E>
).
I think Node
should work as-is since it is a nested class (with the static
keyword) and doesn't inherit the definition of E
from DoublyLinkedList
. However, it'd probably make sense here to declare it as a non-static inner class of DoublyLinkedList
(private class Node
) the same as MyListIter
.
Also, you should probably allow E
to be a type that is a subtype of some type that implements Comparable
by declaring it as E extends Comparable<? super E>
.
It looks like you're getting this error because you're redefining E
in your Node
nested class. Since it's a static nested class, it has no direct relationship to the parent class DoublyLinkedList
. It might make more sense to make the class non-static so that E
continues to have meaning within it. For example:
private class Node {
Node next = null;
Node prev = null;
E data;
...
EDIT: as ColinD noted, MyListIter
should similarly not redeclare E
as a type parameter. Changing this like with Node
should fix the issue.
ColinD is right (+1).
To understand what's going on, imagine not using the same formal type parameter 3 times, but E for DoublyLinkedList, F for Node and G for MyListIter. Then the error message would say Type mismatch: cannot convert from type DoublyLinkedList.Node<E> to DoublyLinkedList.Node<G>
. The solution is the one ColinD suggested. If you want, you can leave Node<F>
static, with the fix all instances will have the same actual type parameter.
精彩评论