Hibernate vs ActiveJDBC [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. 开发者_高级运维

---

Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.

Closed 8 years ago.

Improve this question

I am getting frustrated with Hibernate, the need to impleement equals, hascode, attach detach session, etc.. while it promises to ease the pain working in plain JDBC, it is introducing new complexity of its own.

Now ActiveJDBC seems like the holy grail..

ActiveJDBC: New Java ORM

ActiveJDBC Wiki

But have anyone used in large real world application? Any feedback?

---

Best to post this to the ActiveJDBC community: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/activejdbc-group, I can only speak for myself.
We started using ActiveJDBC in 2009. Currently we have it powering 4 websites for a major insurance company (3 environments for each: test, qa, production), massive batch processing architecture clustered with Weblogic JMS (ten nodes), and a handful of internal projects. We do not use Hibernate anymore, except legacy apps.
Our DB is all Oracle (legacy DB) and our schema is pretty complex, with links to other schemas, sequences, triggers, etc. Current schema size is 90 tables. I have seen other people on ActiveJDBC forums use it on schemas of several hundred tables.

---

Consider using Norm. It's lightweight and very straightforward. It's in heavy production use.