Some agents in an ancient Lotus Notes application has a difference in agent-enabled behaviour that I cannot explain:
This is the agent list read开发者_运维百科 in R7.0.3:
Enabled agents in R7, notice the small "6" http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/a167158e29.png
Here is the agents in the same database, read with R8.5:
Enabled agents in R8, seems disabled. http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/cc042913f1.png
I've checked the following but haven't found any difference between the agents:
- Inheritance: They inherit from the same template, no prohibit flag set.
- User activation: They all allow user activation
- Language: They are all LotusScript agents.
$flags
are the same on all three documents.
There is a difference in trigger: The Auto-unlock agent is triggered on document modification, the others on schedule.
There is also a difference in that the ones with a "6" seems to have been exposed to CIAO - but even if the Notes client CIAO-aware that still leaves the difference between R7 and R8 to explanation.
So, why is there a 6 in the agent checkmark on R7?
From the Lotus Notes Designer version 8 online help:
When you view a list of agents in the Work pane, an icon may appear next to the name of a scheduled agent. The icons are:
- Check mark with a 6 next to it - the scheduled agent is enabled and runs only on IBM® Lotus® Domino(TM) 6 or later (or on Lotus Notes/Domino R5.08 or later).
- Check mark with a 5 next to it - the scheduled agent is disabled for Lotus Domino release 5.08 or later, but will be considered enabled on Lotus Notes Domino R5.07 or earlier which does not recognize this functionality.
- Check mark - the scheduled agent is enabled and runs on any version of IBM® Lotus® Notes®.
- A yellow X - the scheduled agent is disabled.
So I'm thinking that, in the transition from Notes 7 to 8 (and that was a big one since it was basically a rewrite of Notes on top of Eclipse), extra flags were introduced that Notes 7 picks up as the R508+ icon but which is, in reality, a "disabled" flag in Notes 8.
This would be similar to their description of R507 not recognising the R508+ flag and considering it enabled.
If you really want to know, ask here where the actual developers hang out (they may well keep an eye on StackOverflow but I know that IBM software developers have to monitor the IBM-run forums from personal experience).
精彩评论