开发者

What is the memory management problem with this bit of code?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-03-28 04:01 出处:网络
The XCode analyzer tells me there is a problem at line 4 — return [originalError copy]; — but I don\'t see it. Help me please?

The XCode analyzer tells me there is a problem at line 4 — return [originalError copy]; — but I don't see it. Help me please?

- (NSError *)errorFromOriginalError:(NSError *)originalError error:(NSError *)secondError
{
    if (secondError == nil) {
        return [originalError copy];
    }
    // ...
}

The problem description is:

  • Potential leak of an object allocated on line 203
    • Method returns an Objective-C object with a +1 retain count (owning reference)
    • Object returned to caller as an owning reference (single retain count transferred to caller)
    • Object allocated on line 203 is returned from a method whose name ('errorFromOriginalError:error:') does not contain 'copy' or otherwise starts with 'new' or 'alloc'. This violates the naming convention rules given in the Memory Management Guide for Cocoa (object leaked)
  • Potential null dereference. According to coding standards in 'Creating and Returning NSError Objects' the parameter 'error' may be null

The third issue seems to suggest I should either change the name or the behaviour of the method further. Any suggestions on that? The method is derived from the errorFromOriginalError:error: method described in Apple's Core Data Validation document. Its purpose is to combine originalError and secondError so that secondError is a sub-error of originalError.

My addition tries to ensure that the method still works if there is no actual secondError. Since a new error object is created if secondError is not nil, 开发者_运维百科I wanted to recreate that in the case displayed above by simply copying the error object.


You are making a copy of originalError, but your function name implies that the returned object will be autoreleased. Try

return [[originalError copy] autorelease];


[originalError copy] creates a new object with a retain count set to 1. It would then be the responsibility of the calling method to release that object. If you're doing this then it isn't necessarily a problem, but it's probably a better ideas to autorelease it.

ie

return [[originalError copy] autorelease];
0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号