c++ const on a collection

I was surprised when the declaration:

const std::map<double, Foo*> myCollection;

would not allow me to call non-const methods on Foo*. I thought the const applied to the collection itself (i.e., no items could be added or removed). I would think the way to convey item const would be:

std::map<double, Foo const*> myCollection;

It seems the const in the first code snippet is distributive to the contents of the map instead of my assumption of applying only to the collection.

Am I missing something here? It seems counter-intuitive. How can I call non-const methods on the Foo* objects in the fir开发者_如何学JAVAst declaration?

---

You must be doing something wrong -- operator[] on std::map is not declared const, so it cannot be used to access elements of the map. The reason it's not const is because if the key isn't present in the map, it gets added to the map with a default-constructed value, and doing so modifies the map.

Instead, use the find method to get an iterator. The returned iterator cannot be used to modify the map, but it can be used to modify the objects which are pointed to by the values. For example, the following code compiles and outputs 4:

#include <iostream>
#include <map>

typedef std::map<int, int*> Map;

void foo(const Map& m)
{
  Map::const_iterator i = m.find(0);
  (*i->second)++;
}

int main(void)
{
  Map x;
  int y = 3;
  x[0] = &y;
  foo(x);

  std::cout << *x[0] << std::endl;

  return 0;
}

---

Your std::map is declared as const. You are likely only to get const iterators out of it.

You also can't use [] on a std::map because that returns a reference to the map element, which means you could modify it - thus it is a compiler error.

To add to your question though, std::mapconstifies its key type anyway: std::map<double, Foo*>::value_type is std::pair<const double, Foo*>. If you add a const to the key type, const const double will simply collapse to const double.