I have a little bit of code that looks just like this:
function StrippedExample(i1, i2, i3, i4, i5, i6, i7, i8) {
this.i = [];
for (var i=1,j=0 ;i<9;i++) {
var k = eval("i"+i);
if (k > 0) {
this.i[j++] = k;
}
}
}
FireBug profiler claims that second longest function is eval(), taking up to nearly 6% of the run time.
Everyone says eval is EVIL (as in bad) and slow (as I have found), but I can't really do anything else - the server simply pulls the data out the database and pushes to the browser.
What alternatives do I have? I could do the same as I am doing here on the serv开发者_开发问答er but that just shifts the burden higher up the chain. I can't change the database layout since everything hooks into those 8 variables and is a massive undertaking.
function StrippedExample(i1, i2, i3, i4, i5, i6, i7, i8) {
var args = [i1, i2, i3, i4, i5, i6, i7, i8]; // put values in an array
this.i = [];
for (var i=0,j=0 ;i<8;i++) { // now i goes from 0-7 also
var k = args[i]; // get values out
if (k > 0) {
this.i[j++] = k;
}
}
}
The above code can be simplified further, I just made the minimal change to get rid of eval
. You can get rid of j
, for example:
function StrippedExample(i1, i2, i3, i4, i5, i6, i7, i8) {
var args = [i1, i2, i3, i4, i5, i6, i7, i8];
this.i = [];
for (var i = 0; i < args.length; i++) {
var k = args[i];
if (k > 0) { this.i.push(k); }
}
}
is equivalent. Or, to use the built-in arguments
object (to avoid having your parameter list in two places):
function StrippedExample(i1, i2, i3, i4, i5, i6, i7, i8) {
this.i = [];
for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
var k = arguments[i];
if (k > 0) { this.i.push(k); }
}
}
Even if you weren't filtering the list, you don't want to do something like this.i = arguments
because arguments
is not a real Array; it has a callee
property that you don't need and is missing some array methods that you might need in i
. As others have pointed out, if you want to quickly convert the arguments
object into an array, you can do so with this expression:
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)
You could use that instead of the var args = [i1, i2 ...
lines above.
Eval alternative:
exp = '1 + 1'
x = Function('return ' + exp)()
console.log(x)
You are simply making an array from your function 8 arguments, removing the ones that are less than or equal to zero.
The following code is equivalent, and it will work for any arbitrary number of arguments:
function StrippedExample() {
var args = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
if (arguments[i] > 0) {
args.push(arguments[i]);
}
}
//...
}
- Call the function with one argument — an Array
- Use the arguments object
One alternative to to pass an array to your function, instead of individual arguments:
StrippedExample([3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 9, 2, 6])
Then your code would be:
function StrippedExample(inArray) {
this.i = [];
for (var i=0,j=0 ;i<inArray.length;i++) {
var k = inArray[i];
if (k > 0) {
this.i[j++] = k;
}
}
}
If you really need to pass in separate arguments, you can access them using your arguments
array, which is an object that acts like an array (though it's not really; not all Array methods work on it) that exposes all arguments that have been passed in to your function; they do not even need to be declared in this case, but it's good form to include a comment indicating what sorts of arguments you are expecting for users of your code:
function StrippedExample(/*i1, i2, i3, i4, i5, i6, i7, i8*/) {
this.i = [];
for (var i=0,j=0 ;i<arguments.length;i++) {
var k = arguments[i];
if (k > 0) {
this.i[j++] = k;
}
}
}
If you're guaranteed to only have 8 elements, then you could use 8
in place of inArray.length
or arguments.length
; I decided to use the more general version in my examples in case that was helpful to you.
This code should be made to use the arguments
array that every Javascript function has access to.
It's not that eval
is evil (it's in Lisp, so it must be good) it's simply a sign of a hack - you need something to work and you forced it. It screams out to me "The author gave up on good programming design and just found something that worked".
function StrippedExample() {
this.i = [];
for (var i=1,j=0 ;i<arguments.length;i++) {
var k = arguments[i];
if (k > 0) {
this.i[j++] = k;
}
}
}
- Short answer:
StrippedExample=(...a)=>a.filter(i=>i>0);
no need use eval for work with arguments at all.
- Initial code and most proposed solutions doesn't return result by traditional way.
Given that there is a fixed amount of variables, you can build an array of them manually and loop through it. But if you have a variable amount of arguments, one way to get the variables passed to the function as an array is:
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments.callee.caller.arguments);
And your function would look like this:
function StrippedExample() {
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments.callee.caller.arguments);
for(var i in args) {
if (args[i] > 0) {
this.i[j++] = args[i];
}
}
}
You can also run string expressions with setTimeout. It works the same as the Function object.
let a=10;
window.a=100;
window.b=1;
setTimeout("let c=1000;console.log(a,b,c)");//10,1,1000
definitely try this as a drop in replacement. I was looking for this answer and came to this post. I read the developer doc and this worked as a direct replacement in my application
var func1 = "stringtxt" + object + "stringtxt";
instead of ---> eval(func1); --> use --> Function(func1)();
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/eval#Never_use_eval!
精彩评论