This program compiles fine but seg faults when running the value->getSmall
in Period::display()
. I'm working on linux with g++. I've provided a getSmall
function for all the classes that may be used as T
. Just to be sure I added the debug lines and found that the segfault is caused when type of value ie T
is Class* . I came across some FAQ which mentioned some problems like calling independent values in a templated context but I'm clueless about how to solve this.
using namespace std;
template <class T> //T is the class which has to be related & referenced to by period
class Period
{
T value;
public:
void display()
{
cout<<setw(5)<<"| "<< value->getSmall() << "|";
size_t len; //for debug
int s; //for debug
char* p=abi::__cxa_demangle(typeid(value).name(), 0, &len, &s); //for debug
cout<<setw(5)<<"| "<< p << "|"; //for debug
}
};
class Class
{
string name;
timeTable<Teacher*> tt; //class timetable contains pointers to teachers
vector<Teacher::teachTimePerClass> teachers; //set of all teachers teaching in a Class with corresponding total time
//assigns a teacher to a period in a day
bool assign(dayNames day,int periodNum,Teacher *teacher)
{
tt.assign(day,periodNum,teacher); //assign the value in this Class's timetable
teacher->assign(day,periodNum,this); //update the teacher's timeTable
}
public:
static vector<Class*> Clas开发者_如何学运维ses; //dont forget to destory it at the end!!
string getSmall()
{
return name;
}
};
vector<Class*> Class::Classes;
You assume T
to be a pointer, but never give it a value in Period
.
That way you have an uninitialized pointer that is likely to segfault.
string getSmall() // Class::getSmall()
{
//return name;
}
If this is your real code than, your return
statement is missing; which is an undefined behavior. Luckily you are getting a segmentation fault. This kind of bugs are difficult to trace. You should provide -Wall
option while compiling with g++
; it will suggest such kind of logical errors as warnings. See demo.
精彩评论