I want to differentiate the STDOUT and STDERR messages in my terminal. If a script or command is printing a message in terminal I want to differentiate by colors; is it possible?
(E.g. stderr font color is red, and stdout font color is blue.)
Example (using bold):
$date
Wed Jul 27 12:36:50 IST 开发者_如何学Python2011
$datee
bash: datee: command not found
$alias ls
alias ls='ls --color=auto -F'
$aliass ls
bash: aliass: command not found
Create a function in a bash shell or script:
color()(set -o pipefail;"$@" 2>&1>&3|sed $'s,.*,\e[31m&\e[m,'>&2)3>&1
Use it like this:
$ color command -program -args
It will show the command's stderr
in red.
Keep reading for an explanation of how it works. There are some interesting features demonstrated by this command.
color()...
— Creates a bash function called color.set -o pipefail
— This is a shell option that preserves the error return code of a command whose output is piped into another command. This is done in a subshell, which is created by the parentheses, so as not to change the pipefail option in the outer shell."$@"
— Executes the arguments to the function as a new command."$@"
is equivalent to"$1" "$2" ...
2>&1
— Redirects thestderr
of the command tostdout
so that it becomessed
'sstdin
.>&3
— Shorthand for1>&3
, this redirectsstdout
to a new temporary file descriptor3
.3
gets routed back intostdout
later.sed ...
— Because of the redirects above,sed
'sstdin
is thestderr
of the executed command. Its function is to surround each line with color codes.$'...'
A bash construct that causes it to understand backslash-escaped characters.*
— Matches the entire line.\e[31m
— The ANSI escape sequence that causes the following characters to be red&
— Thesed
replace character that expands to the entire matched string (the entire line in this case).\e[m
— The ANSI escape sequence that resets the color.>&2
— Shorthand for1>&2
, this redirectssed
'sstdout
tostderr
.3>&1
— Redirects the temporary file descriptor3
back intostdout
.
Here's a hack that I thought of and it seems to work:
Given the following aliases for readability:
alias blue='echo -en "\033[36m"'
alias red='echo -en "\033[31m"'
alias formatOutput='while read line; do blue; echo $line; red; done'
Now, you need to first set the font color in your terminal to red (as the default, which will be used for stderr).
Then, run your command and pipe the stdout through formatOutput
defined above (which simply prints each line as blue and then resets the font color to red):
shell$ red
shell$ ls / somenonexistingfile | formatOutput
The above command will print in both stderr and stdout and you'll see that the lines are coloured differently.
Hope this helps
UPDATE:
To make this reusable, I've put it all in a small script:
$ cat bin/run
#!/bin/bash
echo -en "\033[31m" ## red
eval $* | while read line; do
echo -en "\033[36m" ## blue
echo $line
echo -en "\033[31m" ## red
done
echo -en "\033[0m" ## reset color
Now you can use this with any command:
$ run yourCommand
I color stderr red by linking the file descriptor to a custom function that adds color to everything that goes through it. Add to following to your .bashrc
:
export COLOR_RED="$(tput setaf 1)"
export COLOR_RESET="$(tput sgr0)"
exec 9>&2
exec 8> >(
perl -e '$|=1; while(sysread STDIN,$a,9999) {print
"$ENV{COLOR_RED}$a$ENV{COLOR_RESET}"}'
)
function undirect(){ exec 2>&9; }
function redirect(){ exec 2>&8; }
trap "redirect;" DEBUG
PROMPT_COMMAND='undirect;'
So what is happening? The debug trap is executed just before and immediately after executing a command. stderr is thus redirected before a command is executed to enable red output. PROMPT_COMMAND is evaluated before the prompt is shown and with this I restore stderr to its normal state. This is necessary because PS1 and PS2 (your prompt) are printed over stderr and I do not want a red prompt. voila, red output over stderr!
You should check out stderred: https://github.com/sickill/stderred
Yes it's not possible natively. You'll have to hack the tty management (in the kernel).
I somehow finished some little C wrapper before I saw the other answers :-) Might be buggy, and values are hardcoded, don't use this except for testing.
#include "unistd.h"
#include "stdio.h"
#include <sys/select.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char buf[1024];
int pout[2], perr[2];
pipe(pout); pipe(perr);
if (fork()!=0)
{
close(1); close(2);
dup2(pout[1],1); dup2(perr[1],2);
close(pout[1]); close(perr[1]);
execvp(argv[1], argv+1);
fprintf(stderr,"exec failed\n");
return 0;
}
close(pout[1]); close(perr[1]);
while (1)
{
fd_set fds;
FD_ZERO(&fds);
FD_SET(pout[0], &fds);
FD_SET(perr[0], &fds);
int max = pout[0] > perr[0] ? pout[0] : perr[0];
int v = select(max+1, &fds, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (FD_ISSET(pout[0], &fds))
{
int r;
r = read(pout[0], buf, 1024);
if (!r) {close(pout[0]); continue;}
write(1, "\033[33m", 5);
write(1, buf, r);
write(1, "\033[0m", 4);
}
if (FD_ISSET(perr[0], &fds))
{
int r;
r = read(perr[0], buf, 1024);
if (!r) {close(perr[0]); continue;}
write(2, "\033[31m", 5);
write(2, buf, r);
write(2, "\033[0m", 4);
}
if (v <= 0) break;
}
return 0;
}
Edit: Compared to the shell solution, this one will preserve the order of lines/characters more often. (It's not possible to be as accurate as direct tty reading.) Hitting ^C won't show an ugly error message, and it behaves correctly on this example:
./c_color_script sh -c "while true; do (echo -n a; echo -n b 1>&2) done"
I'm surprised that nobody has actually figured out how to color stdio streams. This will color stderr red for the entire (sub)shell:
exec 3>&2
exec 2> >(sed -u 's/^\(.*\)$/'$'\e''[31m\1'$'\e''[m/' >&3)
In this case, &3
will hold the original stderr stream.
You should not be passing any commands to exec
, only the redirects. This special case causes exec
to replace the current (sub)shell's stdio streams with those that it receives.
There are a few caveats:
- Since
sed
will be running persistently in a parallel subshell, any direct output immediately following a write to the colored stdio will probably beatsed
to thetty
. - This method uses a FIFO file descriptor; FIFO nodes only deal in lines. If you don't write a linefeed to the stream, your output will be buffered until a newline is encountered. This is not buffering on
sed
's part: it's how these file types function.
The most troublesome of the caveats is the first, but a race condition can be more or less avoided by applying similar processing to all outputs, even if you use the default color.
You can perform similar processing for single commands by piping to the same sed
command with the normal pipe operator (|
). Piped chains are executed synchronously, so no race condition will occur, though the last command in a pipe chain receives its own subshell by default.
Expanding on the answer @gospes gave, I added the functionality to print out partial lines without waiting for a newline, and some comments. Allows for better output from wget or typing in a interactive shell.
exec 9>&2
exec 8> >(
while [ "$r" != "1" ]; do
# read input, no field separators or backslash escaping, 1/20th second timeout
IFS='' read -rt 0.05 line
r=$?
# if we have input, print the color change control char and what input we have
if ! [ "${#line}" = "0" ]; then
echo -ne "\e[1;33m${line}"
fi
# end of line detected, print default color control char and newline
if [ "$r" = "0" ] ; then
echo -e "\e[0m"
fi
# slow infinite loops on unexpected returns - shouldn't happen
if ! [ "$r" = "0" ] && ! [ "$r" = "142" ]; then
sleep 0.05
fi
done
)
function undirect(){ exec 2>&9; }
function redirect(){ exec 2>&8; }
trap "redirect;" DEBUG
PROMPT_COMMAND='undirect;'
I used bold yellow (1;33) but you can replace it with whatever, red for example (31) or bold red (1;33), and I arbitrarily chose 0.05 seconds for re-checking for end-of-lines and pausing on unexpected return codes (never found any); it could probably be lowered, or possibly removed from the read command.
You can make use of grep
for this. Note that this assumes that grep is configured to have coloured output (this is the default on many systems).
$ aliass ls 2> >(GREP_COLORS='ms=01;31' grep .) 1> >(GREP_COLORS='ms=01;32' grep .)
aliass: command not found
This is a little long winded, if you are simply wanting to distinguish stderr
fromstdout
you can simply do this:
$ (echo "this is stdout"; echo "this is stderr" >&2) | grep .
this is stderr
this is stdout
This will result in stdout
being highlighted with the default grep colour and stderr
being white.
This might be the opposite of what you want if your default grep colour is red. If so you can explicitly set the grep colour to green:
$ GREP_COLORS='ms=01;32'
$ (echo "this is stdout"; echo "this is stderr" >&2) | grep .
If you explicitly want to get red output for stderr
:
$ GREP_COLORS='ms=01;31'
$ (echo "this is stdout"; echo "this is stderr" >&2) 2> >(grep .)
Note that this solution will not preserve the output order.
精彩评论