I have a list of lists.
List<List<T>> li = {
{a1,a2,a3 ... aN},
{b1,b2,b3 ... bN},
...
};
double foo开发者_如何学JAVA(List<T> list)
{
// do something
// e.g {1,2,3}
// it = 1 + 2 + 3
return it;
}
Now I want to sort li
in such a way that higher the foo(x)
for a x
higher it should appear in a sorted list.
What is the best way in C#/Python/any other lang to this?
With a little bit of LINQ:
var q = from el in li
orderby foo(el)
select el;
li = q.ToList();
The Haskell solution is particularly elegant with the on
combinator from Data.Function.
import Data.Function (on)
import Data.List (sortBy)
lists = [ [ 5, 6, 8 ]
, [ 1, 2, 3 ]
]
main = do
print $ sortBy (compare `on` foo) lists
where
foo = sum
Output:
[[1,2,3],[5,6,8]]
There's also comparing
from Data.Ord that lets us instead write
main = do
print $ sortBy (comparing foo) lists
where
foo = sum
The definition of comparing
is a straightforward
comparing :: (Ord a) => (b -> a) -> b -> b -> Ordering
comparing p x y = compare (p x) (p y)
but we could also define it in terms of on
:
comparing :: (Ord b) => (a -> b) -> a -> a -> Ordering
comparing f = compare `on` f
or completely point-free with
comparing :: (Ord b) => (a -> b) -> a -> a -> Ordering
comparing = (compare `on`)
Haskell manipulates functions as powerfully as Perl manipulates strings.
This is the Python way: Just pass the function as the key
argument to sorted()
or .sort()
:
>>> mylist = [123, 765, 4, 13]
>>> def mod5(x):
... return x%5
...
>>> sorted(mylist, key = mod5)
[765, 123, 13, 4]
>>> sorted(mylist, key = mod5, reverse = True)
[4, 123, 13, 765]
Ruby:
mylist = [[1,2,3],
[3,5,9],
[1,1,1],
[10,23,14]]
sortedlist = mylist.sort {|a,b| b.inject {|sum, n| sum + n } <=> a.inject {|sum,n| sum + n}}
I'm not sure the rules of Code Golf and I didn't write a foo method, but the sum could easily occur in foo.
My test output:
puts sortedlist.inspect
[[10, 23, 14], [3, 5, 9], [1, 2, 3], [1, 1, 1]]
In Perl, this is often done with the well-known Schwartzian transform.
use List::Util qw(sum);
@li = map {$$_[0]} sort {$$a[1] <=> $$b[1]} map {[$_, sum(@$_)]} @li;
Reusing Sort::Key is better, though.
use List::Util qw(sum);
use Sort::Key qw(nkeysort);
@li = nkeysort {sum(@$_)} @li;
Any other language? Ok, here's some F#:
Example: sort by sum:
let foo = List.sum
let li = [[1;2];[42;1];[3;4]]
let result = li |> List.sortBy (fun el -> foo el)
Result (F# interactive):
val result : int list list = [[1; 2]; [3; 4]; [42; 1]]
Golfed:
let result = li |> List.sortBy (fun el -> foo el)
//shorter
let res = li |> List.sortBy foo
//evn shrtr
let r=List.sortBy foo li
The C# version:
var result = li.OrderBy(el=>el.Sum());
in erlang:
-module (codegolfs).
-export ([sortmain/0]).
sortmain() ->
sort(
fun (SubList) -> lists:sum(SubList) end,
[ [1,2,3],[1,3],[2,5,6] ]).
% output: [[2,5,6],[1,2,3],[1,3]]
sort(Fun,List) ->
lists:sort( fun(A,B) -> Fun(A) < Fun(B) end,List ).
Ruby (shamelessly copying Beanish's input data):
list = [
[1, 2, 3],
[3, 5, 9],
[1, 1, 1],
[10, 23, 14]
]
p list.sort_by { |a| -a.inject(&:+) }
# => [[10, 23, 14], [3, 5, 9], [1, 2, 3], [1, 1, 1]]
Clojure:
(let [lst '((1 2 3) (3 5 9) (1 1 1) (10 23 14))]
(sort #(> (foo %1) (foo %2)) lst))
You could adapt any of the popular sorting routines to do this. Just use foo(x) for comparison rather than x.
Tcl:
proc foo nums {tcl::mathop::+ {*}$nums}
set l {{1 2 3} {4 5 6} {3} {42 -40}}
lsort -command {apply {{a b} {expr {[foo $a] - [foo $b]}}}} $l
# => {42 -40} 3 {1 2 3} {4 5 6}
精彩评论