Can I define a class which derives from DynamicObject and supports an interface (ICanDoManyThings) without having to implement each method in the interface?
I'm trying to make a dynamic proxy object, and want the m开发者_运维知识库ethod invocations on this class to be handled by the implementation of MyProxyClass.TryInvokeMember, which may or may not pass them on to a wrapped object.
Is this possible?
Thanks
ImpromptuInterface does exactly this and it works with ANY IDynamicMetaObjectProvider including DynamicObject subclasses and ExpandoObject.
using ImpromptuInterface;
using ImpromptuInterface.Dynamic;
public interface IMyInterface{
string Prop1 { get; }
long Prop2 { get; }
Guid Prop3 { get; }
bool Meth1(int x);
}
...
//Dynamic Expando object
dynamic tNew = Build<ExpandoObject>.NewObject(
Prop1: "Test",
Prop2: 42L,
Prop3: Guid.NewGuid(),
Meth1: Return<bool>.Arguments<int>(it => it > 5)
);
IMyInterface tActsLike = Impromptu.ActLike<IMyInterface>(tNew);
Linfu won't actually use DLR based objects and rather uses it's own naive late binding which gives it a SERIOUS performance cost. Clay does use the dlr but you have to stick with Clay objects which are designed for you to inject all behavior into a ClayObject which isn't always straightforward.
With Clay, you can.
An example:
public interface IMyInterface
{
string Prop1 { get; }
long Prop2 { get; }
Guid Prop3 { get; }
Func<int, bool> Meth { get; }
}
//usage:
dynamic factory = new ClayFactory();
var iDynamic = factory.MyInterface
(
Prop1: "Test",
Prop2: 42L,
Prop3: Guid.NewGuid(),
Meth: new Func<int, bool>(i => i > 5)
);
IMyInterface iStatic = iDynamic;
This article shows few more ways to achieve this.
Check out LinFu's proxies, mixins and duck typing.
精彩评论