What is the difference between:
t.boolean :test, :default => true
and
t.boolean :test, :null => true
and
t.boolean :test, 开发者_如何学编程:default => true, :null => true
EDIT
Does the following make any sense?
t.boolean :test, :default => true, :null => false
"null" means "are you allowed to enter a null value in this column"?
Whereas "default" means "if there is a null value in this column ... then use this default value instead"
So, for your examples:
t.boolean :test, :default => true
"this boolean column will insert a true if you don't bother setting a value for it"
t.boolean :test, :null => true
"this boolean column will let you set it to true, false or null - and it will stay the way you set it"
t.boolean :test, :default => true, :null => true
"this boolean column will let you set it to true, false or null... but if you set it to null it will automatically be set to true"
:default - The column’s default value. Use nil for NULL.
:null - Allows or disallows NULL values in the column. This option could have been named :null_allowed.
In the first option, if you don't specify anything, rails will put true In the second option, it will allow the value to be null. In the third option, both apply, the values can be true, false and nil
To answer OP's question:
Does the following make any sense?
t.boolean :test, :default => true, :null => false
Sure, let's take a look at the possible SQL events. (Bear in mind the default
parameter you set takes effect on INSERT INTO
statements like the following.)
INSERT INTO table_name id, test VALUES 1, NULL; # This should raise an error
INSERT INTO table_name id VALUES 1; # This will default test column's value to true
So, it may make sense - if you want to explicitly disallow NULL
values (should an attempt to made to set the value to NULL
directly), and you also want to coerce missing or absent values on the test
column to true
during INSERT INTO
statements.
精彩评论