getting the bounds of a list of x,y points

I have a list of x,y points stored as a vector of vectors, and I want to find out the bounds.

For example, given this:

[[0 0] [20 30] [-50 -70] [200 300]]

The resu开发者_如何转开发lt would be:

{:x -50, :y -70, :x2 200, :y2 300}

Here's what I have so far. It gives the desired result, but seems verbose and not very clojure-ey to me.

(defn get-stroke-bounds [vector-of-points]
  (reduce (fn [m [x y]]
        {:x  (min (:x  m Integer/MAX_VALUE) x)
         :y  (min (:y  m Integer/MAX_VALUE) y)
         :x2 (max (:x2 m Integer/MIN_VALUE) x)
         :y2 (max (:y2 m Integer/MIN_VALUE) y)})
      {}
      (vector-of-points)))

Any ideas on how to improve it? Thanks!

---

Your solution is already pretty good! It's fairly idiomatic and is also O(n) in the number of points which is algorithmically optimal (better in fact than a method which does a sort).

But here's an alternative way of doing it you might find interesting.... created mainly because I'm a big fan of higher order functions :-)

(defn get-stroke-bounds [stroke]
     (zipmap
       [:x :y :x2 :y2]
       (map
         (fn [[getter reducer]]
           (reduce 
             reducer
             (map getter stroke)))
         [
          [first min]
          [second min]
          [first max]
          [second max]])))

---

If I am already using vectors for the input points, I'd want the return value to be in the same format. With that in mind, I think this is a good idiomatic solution:

(defn bounds
  [points]
  (let [xs (sort (map first points))
        ys (sort (map second points))]
    (list [(first xs) (first ys)]
          [(last xs) (last ys)])))

---

I don't think your solution not clojure-ey too. But if you like less code you could try a sorted set.

(let [v [[0 0] [20 30] [-50 -70] [200 300]]
      v-sorted (apply sorted-set v)]
  [(first v-sorted) (last v-sorted)])

Update: I'm sorry the above code is not correct. It is neccessary to sort separetely x and y to find a bound not max or min points. John's solution is better unless sets is preferred.