开发者

combination of expand.grid and mapply?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-03-16 05:44 出处:网络
I am trying to come up with a variant of mapply (call it xapply for now) that combines the functionality (sort of) of expand.grid and mapply.That is, for a function FUN and a list of arguments L1, L2,

I am trying to come up with a variant of mapply (call it xapply for now) that combines the functionality (sort of) of expand.grid and mapply. That is, for a function FUN and a list of arguments L1, L2, L3, ... of unknown length, it should produce a list of length n1*n2*n3 (where ni is the length of list i) which is the result of applying FUN to all combinations of the elements of the list.

If expand.grid worked to generate lists of lists rather than data frames, one might be able to use it, but I have in mind that the lists may be lists of things that won't necessarily fit into a data frame nicely.

This f开发者_如何学运维unction works OK if there are exactly three lists to expand, but I am curious about a more generic solution. (FLATTEN is unused, but I can imagine that FLATTEN=FALSE would generate nested lists rather than a single list ...)

xapply3 <- function(FUN,L1,L2,L3,FLATTEN=TRUE,MoreArgs=NULL) {
  retlist <- list()
  count <- 1
  for (i in seq_along(L1)) {
    for (j in seq_along(L2)) {
      for (k in seq_along(L3)) {
        retlist[[count]] <- do.call(FUN,c(list(L1[[i]],L2[[j]],L3[[k]]),MoreArgs))
        count <- count+1
      }
    }
  }
  retlist
}

edit: forgot to return the result. One might be able to solve this by making a list of the indices with combn and going from there ...


I think I have a solution to my own question, but perhaps someone can do better (and I haven't implemented FLATTEN=FALSE ...)

xapply <- function(FUN,...,FLATTEN=TRUE,MoreArgs=NULL) {
  L <- list(...)
  inds <- do.call(expand.grid,lapply(L,seq_along)) ## Marek's suggestion
  retlist <- list()
  for (i in 1:nrow(inds)) {
    arglist <- mapply(function(x,j) x[[j]],L,as.list(inds[i,]),SIMPLIFY=FALSE)
    if (FLATTEN) {
      retlist[[i]] <- do.call(FUN,c(arglist,MoreArgs))
    }
  }
  retlist
}

edit: I tried @baptiste's suggestion, but it's not easy (or wasn't for me). The closest I got was

xapply2 <- function(FUN,...,FLATTEN=TRUE,MoreArgs=NULL) {
  L <- list(...)
  xx <- do.call(expand.grid,L)
  f <- function(...) {
    do.call(FUN,lapply(list(...),"[[",1))
  }
  mlply(xx,f)
}

which still doesn't work. expand.grid is indeed more flexible than I thought (although it creates a weird data frame that can't be printed), but enough magic is happening inside mlply that I can't quite make it work.

Here is a test case:

L1 <- list(data.frame(x=1:10,y=1:10),
           data.frame(x=runif(10),y=runif(10)),
           data.frame(x=rnorm(10),y=rnorm(10)))

L2 <- list(y~1,y~x,y~poly(x,2))          
z <- xapply(lm,L2,L1)
xapply(lm,L2,L1)


@ben-bolker, I had a similar desire and think I have a preliminary solution worked out, that I've also tested to work in parallel. The function, which I somewhat confusingly called gmcmapply (g for grid) takes an arbitrarily large named list mvars (that gets expand.grid-ed within the function) and a FUN that utilizes the list names as if they were arguments to the function itself (gmcmapply will update the formals of FUN so that by the time FUN is passed to mcmapply it's arguments reflect the variables that the user would like to iterate over (which would be layers in a nested for loop)). mcmapply then dynamically updates the values of these formals as it cycles over the expanded set of variables in mvars.

I've posted the preliminary code as a gist (reprinted with an example below) and would be curious to get your feedback on it. I'm a grad student, that is self-described as an intermediately-skilled R enthusiast, so this is pushing my R skills for sure. You or other folks in the community may have suggestions that would improve on what I have. I do think even as it stands, I'll be coming to this function quite a bit in the future.

gmcmapply <- function(mvars, FUN, SIMPLIFY = FALSE, mc.cores = 1, ...){
  require(parallel)

  FUN <- match.fun(FUN)
  funArgs <- formals(FUN)[which(names(formals(FUN)) != "...")] # allow for default args to carry over from FUN.

  expand.dots <- list(...) # allows for expanded dot args to be passed as formal args to the user specified function

  # Implement non-default arg substitutions passed through dots.
  if(any(names(funArgs) %in% names(expand.dots))){
    dot_overwrite <- names(funArgs[which(names(funArgs) %in% names(expand.dots))])
    funArgs[dot_overwrite] <- expand.dots[dot_overwrite]

    #for arg naming and matching below.
    expand.dots[dot_overwrite] <- NULL
  }

  ## build grid of mvars to loop over, this ensures that each combination of various inputs is evaluated (equivalent to creating a structure of nested for loops)
  grid <- expand.grid(mvars,KEEP.OUT.ATTRS = FALSE, stringsAsFactors = FALSE)

  # specify formals of the function to be evaluated  by merging the grid to mapply over with expanded dot args
  argdefs <- rep(list(bquote()), ncol(grid) + length(expand.dots) + length(funArgs) + 1)
  names(argdefs) <- c(colnames(grid), names(funArgs), names(expand.dots), "...")

  argdefs[which(names(argdefs) %in% names(funArgs))] <- funArgs # replace with proper dot arg inputs.
  argdefs[which(names(argdefs) %in% names(expand.dots))] <- expand.dots # replace with proper dot arg inputs.

  formals(FUN) <- argdefs

  if(SIMPLIFY) {
    #standard mapply
    do.call(mcmapply, c(FUN, c(unname(grid), mc.cores = mc.cores))) # mc.cores = 1 == mapply
  } else{
    #standard Map
    do.call(mcmapply, c(FUN, c(unname(grid), SIMPLIFY = FALSE, mc.cores = mc.cores)))
  }
}

example code below:

      # Example 1:
      # just make sure variables used in your function appear as the names of mvars
      myfunc <- function(...){
        return_me <- paste(l3, l1^2 + l2, sep = "_")
        return(return_me)
      }

      mvars <- list(l1 = 1:10,
                    l2 = 1:5,
                    l3 = letters[1:3])


      ### list output (mapply)
      lreturns <- gmcmapply(mvars, myfunc)

      ### concatenated output (Map)
      lreturns <- gmcmapply(mvars, myfunc, SIMPLIFY = TRUE)

      ## N.B. This is equivalent to running:
      lreturns <- c()
      for(l1 in 1:10){
        for(l2 in 1:5){
          for(l3 in letters[1:3]){
            lreturns <- c(lreturns,myfunc(l1,l2,l3))
          }
        }
      }

      ### concatenated outout run on 2 cores.
      lreturns <- gmcmapply(mvars, myfunc, SIMPLIFY = TRUE, mc.cores = 2)

     Example 2. Pass non-default args to FUN.
     ## Since the apply functions dont accept full calls as inputs (calls are internal), user can pass arguments to FUN through dots, which can overwrite a default option for FUN.
     # e.g. apply(x,1,FUN) works and apply(x,1,FUN(arg_to_change= not_default)) does not, the correct way to specify non-default/additional args to FUN is:
     # gmcmapply(mvars, FUN, arg_to_change = not_default)

     ## update myfunc to have a default argument
      myfunc <- function(rep_letters = 3, ...){
        return_me <- paste(rep(l3, rep_letters), l1^2 + l2, sep = "_")
        return(return_me)
      }

      lreturns <- gmcmapply(mvars, myfunc, rep_letters = 1)

A bit of additional functionality I would like to add but am still trying to work out is

  1. cleaning up the output to be a pretty nested list with the names of mvars (normally, I'd create multiple lists within a nested for loop and tag lower-level lists onto higher level lists all the way up until all layers of the gigantic nested loop were done). I think using some abstracted variant of the solution provided here will work, but I haven't figured out how to make the solution flexible to the number of columns in the expand.grid-ed data.frame.

  2. I would like an option to log the outputs of the child processesthat get called in mcmapply in a user-specified directory. So you could look at .txt outputs from every combination of variables generated by expand.grid (i.e. if the user prints model summaries or status messages as a part of FUN as I often do). I think a feasible solution is to use the substitute() and body() functions, described here to edit FUN to open a sink() at the beginning of FUN and close it at the end if the user specifies a directory to write to. Right now, I just program it right into FUN itself, but later it would be nice to just pass gmcmapply an argument called something like log_children = "path_to_log_dir. and then editing the body of the function to (pseudocode) sink(file = file.path(log_children, paste0(paste(names(mvars), sep = "_"), ".txt")

Let me know what you think!

-Nate

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消