开发者

When to use an assertion and when to use an exception

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2022-12-14 23:18 出处:网络
Most of the time I will use an exception to check for a condition in my code, I wonder when it is an appropriate time to use an assertion?

Most of the time I will use an exception to check for a condition in my code, I wonder when it is an appropriate time to use an assertion?

For instance,

Group group=null;
try{
    group = service().getGroup("abc");
}catch(Exception e){
    //I dont log error because I know whenever error occur mean group not found
}

if(group !=null)
{
    //do something
}

Could you indicate how an assertion fits in here? Should I use an assertion?

It seems like I never use assertions in production code and only see assertions in unit te开发者_Go百科sts. I do know that in most cases, I can just use exception to do the checking like above, but I want to know appropriate way to do it "professionally".


Out of my mind (list may be incomplete, and is too long to fit in a comment), I would say:

  • use exceptions when checking parameters passed to public or protected methods and constructors
  • use exceptions when interacting with the user or when you expect the client code to recover from an exceptional situation
  • use exceptions to address problems that might occur
  • use assertions when checking pre-conditions, post-conditions and invariants of private/internal code
  • use assertions to provide feedback to yourself or your developer team
  • use assertions when checking for things that are very unlikely to happen otherwise it means that there is a serious flaw in your application
  • use assertions to state things that you (supposedly) know to be true

In other words, exceptions address the robustness of your application while assertions address its correctness.

Assertions are designed to be cheap to write, you can use them almost everywhere and I'm using this rule of thumb: the more an assertion statement looks stupid, the more valuable it is and the more information it embeds. When debugging a program that does not behave the right way, you will surely check the more obvious failure possibilities based on your experience. Then you will check for problems that just cannot happen: this is exactly when assertions help a lot and save time.


Assertions should be used to check something that should never happen, while an exception should be used to check something that might happen.

For example, a function might divide by 0, so an exception should be used, but an assertion could be used to check that the harddrive suddenly disappears.

An assertion would stop the program from running, but an exception would let the program continue running.

Note that if(group != null) is not an assertion, that is just a conditional.


Remember assertions can be disabled at runtime using parameters, and are disabled by default, so don't count on them except for debugging purposes.

Also you should read the Oracle article about assert to see more cases where to use - or not to use - assert.


As a general rule:

  • Use assertions for internal consistency checks where it doesn't matter at all if someone turns them off. (Note that the java command turns off all assertions by default.)
  • Use regular tests for any kind of checks what shouldn't be turned off. This includes defensive checks that guard against potential damage cause by bugs, and any validation data / requests / whatever provided by users or external services.

The following code from your question is bad style and potentially buggy

try {
    group = service().getGroup("abc");
} catch (Exception e) {
    //i dont log error because i know whenever error occur mean group not found
}

The problem is that you DON'T know that an exception means that the group was not found. It is also possible that the service() call threw an exception, or that it returned null which then caused a NullPointerException.

When you catch an "expected" exception, you should catch only the exception that you are expecting. By catching java.lang.Exception (and especially by not logging it), you are making it harder to diagnose / debug the problem, and potentially allowing the app to do more damage.


Well, back at Microsoft, the recommendation was to throw Exceptions in all APIs you make available publicly and use Asserts in all sorts of assumptions you make about code that's internal. It's a bit of a loose definition but I guess it's up to each developer to draw the line.

Regarding the use of Exceptions, as the name says, their usage should be exceptional so for the code you present above, the getGroup call should return null if no service exists. Exception should only occur if a network link goes down or something like that.

I guess the conclusion is that it's a bit left down to the development team for each application to define the boundaries of assert vs exceptions.


According to this doc http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/language/assert.html#design-faq-general, "The assert statement is appropriate for nonpublic precondition, postcondition and class invariant checking. Public precondition checking should still be performed by checks inside methods that result in particular, documented exceptions, such as IllegalArgumentException and IllegalStateException."

If you want to know more about precondition, postcondition and class invariant, check this doc: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/language/assert.html#usage-conditions. It also contains with examples of assertions usage.


Testing for null will only catch nulls causing problems, whereas a try/catch as you have it will catch any error.

Broadly, try/catch is safer, but slightly slower, and you have to be careful that you catch all the kinds of error that may occur. So I would say use try/catch - one day the getGroup code may change, and you just might need that bigger net.


You can use this simple difference in mind while their usage. Exceptions will be used for checking expected and unexpected errors called checked and unchecked error while assertion is used mainly for debugging purposes at the run time to see whether the assumptions are validated or not.


Unfortunately asserts can be disabled. When in production you need all the help you can get when tracking down something unforeseen, so asserts disqualify themselves.


I confess I'm a little confused by your question. When an assertion condition is not met, an exception is thrown. Confusingly this is called AssertionError. Note that it's unchecked, like (for example) IllegalArgumentException which is thrown in very similar circumstances.

So using assertions in Java

  1. is a more concise means of writing a condition/throw block
  2. permits you to turn these checks on/off via JVM parameters. Normally I would leave these checks on all the time, unless they impact runtime performance or have a similar penalty.


See section 6.1.2 (Assertions vs. other error code) of Sun's documentation at the following link.

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/javase/javapch06.pdf

This document gives the best advice I've seen on when to use assertions. Quoting from the document:

"A good rule of thumb is that you should use an assertion for exceptional cases that you would like to forget about. An assertion is the quickest way to deal with, and forget, a condition or state that you don’t expect to have to deal with."

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消