I am aware of factory and abstract factory methods, but I want to create a DAO factory pattern in Java.
- I want to know its importance.
- Its usage
I have checked this link but it is difficult for me to understand.
Can anyone explain it with the help of an example?
Edit: Here is an example of DAO pattern as I understood it:
public interface UserDAO {
public void insert(User user);
public void update(User user);
public void delete(int userId);
}
Implementation:
public class UserDAOImpl implements UserDAO {
@Override
public void delete(int userId) {
// delete user from user table
}
@Override
public User[] findAll() {
// get a list of all users from user table
return null;
}
@Override
public User findByKey(int userId) {
// get a user information if we supply unique userid
return null;
}
@Override
public void insert(User user) {
// insert user into user table
}
@Override
public void update(User user) {
// update user information in user table
}
}
Factory:
public class UserDAOFactory {
public static UserDAO getUserDAO(String type) {
if (type.equalsIgnoreCase("jdbc")) {
return new UserDAOImpl();
开发者_开发问答 } else {
return new UserDAOImpl();
}
}
}
Client side code:
User user=new User();
user.setName("Jinoy P George");
user.setDesignation("Programmer");
user.setAge(35);
//get a reference to UserDAO object
UserDAO userDAO=UserDAOFactory.getUserDAO("jdbc");
//call insert method by passing user object
userDAO.insert(user);
Is this dao pattern correct?
Where should I open connection and close it?
DAO stands for "Data Access Object". It's an interface-based class that handles all your CRUD operations with a relational database for a particular object. Here's an example that uses generics:
package persistence;
public interface GenericDao<K extends Serializable, T>
{
public T find(K id);
public List<T> find();
public K save(T value);
public void update(T value);
public void delete(T value);
}
Think of a factory as a "virtual constructor": its creation method returns an interface type, but you can ask it to create any number of different implementations as needed.
Probably what you don't understand is how the code works? It seems fine.
Just FYI:
What is defined as UserDAOImpl can be better understood if you consider naming it as UserDAOMySQLImpl and another new one as UserDAOMSSQLImpl, and so on for each database access you may need.
In each of those you should handle the connections and add other things like private functions for that specific database server configuration it may need and not forcibly needed to be declared in the interface (UserDAO) but as minimum you must always implement all the methods defined in the interface, then in the Factory (UserDAOFactory) conditions you could have something like this:
`
public class UserDAOFactory{
public static UserDAO getUserDAO(String type){
if (type.equalsIgnoreCase("mysql")){
return new UserDAOMySQLImpl();
}else{
return new UserDAOMSSQLImpl();
}
}
}
A little clearer?
Then, in the client side instead of a hardcoded line like:
UserDAO userDAO=UserDAOFactory.getUserDAO("jdbc");
You could have a properties file to be able to switch between DAOs dynamically, having retrieved that string from the properties file you can simply do:
UserDAO userDAO=UserDAOFactory.getUserDAO(myStringFromPropertiesFile);
myStringFromPropertiesFile would contain "mysql" or "mssql" according to the definition in your properties file.
Hope this helps!
精彩评论