开发者

Use ORDER BY 'x' with a JOIN, but keep rows that don't have a value for 'x'

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-03-13 07:59 出处:网络
This is simplified version of a relatively complex problem that myself and my colleagues can\'t quite get our heads around.

This is simplified version of a relatively complex problem that myself and my colleagues can't quite get our heads around.

Consider two tables, table_a and table_b. In our CMS table_a holds metadata for all the data stored in the database, and table_b has some more specific information, so for simplicity's sake, a title and date column.

At the moment our query looks like:

SELECT * 
FROM `table_a` LEFT OUTER JOIN `table_b` ON (table_a.id = table_b.id)
WHERE table_a.col = 'value'
ORDER BY table_b.date ASC
LIMIT 0,20

This degrades badly when table_a has a large amount of rows. If the JOIN is changed RIGHT OUTER JOIN (which triggers MySQL to use the INDEX set on table_b.date), the query is infinitely quicker, but it doesn't produce the same result开发者_C百科s (because if table_b.date doesn't have a value, it is ignored).

This becomes an issue in our CMS because if the user sorts on the date column, any rows that don't have a date set yet disappear from the interface, creating a confusing UI experience and makes it difficult to add dates for the rows that missing them.

Is there a solution that will:

  1. Use table_b.date's INDEX so that the query will scale better
  2. Somehow retain those rows in table_b that don't have a date set so that a user can enter the data


I'm going to second ArtoAle's comment. since the order by applies to a null value in the outer join for missing rows in table_b, those rows will be out of order anyway.

The simulated outer join is the ugly part, so lets look at that first. Mysql doesn't have except, so you need to write the query in terms of exists.

SELECT table_a.col1, table_a.col2, table_a.col3, ... NULL as table_b_col1, NULL as ...
FROM
    table_a
WHERE
    NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM table_a INNER JOIN table_b ON table_a.id = table_b.id);

Which should be UNION ALLed with the original query as an inner join. The UNION_ALL is needed to preserve the original order.

This sort of query is probably going to be dog-slow no matter what you do, because there won't be an index that readily supports a "Foreign Key not present" sort of query. This basically boils down to an index scan in table_a.id with a lookup (Or maybe a parallel scan) for the corresponding row in table_b.id.


So we ended up implemented a different solution that while the results were not as good as using an INDEX, it still provided a nice speed boost of around 25%.

We remove the JOIN and instead used an ORDER BY subquery:

SELECT * 
FROM `table_a`
WHERE table_a.col = 'value'
ORDER BY (
   SELECT date 
   FROM table_b 
   WHERE id = table_a.id
) ASC
LIMIT 0,20
0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消