Hello fellow developers! Recently I've been playing with Rails 3.0 and after quite a bit of research I'm kinda stuck. I want to know what approach or solution is the best in my case(I couldn't find an answer yet). So what I'm trying to achieve is simple and straight forward.
I want to do something like this:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :feeds
has_many :casts, :through => :feeds
end
class Feed < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users
has_many :casts
end
class Cast < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :feed
end
So at the end I need to have methods like User.first.feeds to get all the user's feeds and User.first.casts to get all the user's casts through his/her feeds. Also would be nice to have Feed.first.casts and Feed.first.users. Pretty simple, right, but I'm also having a hard time to create migrations for what I'm trying to achieve.
I know that the code above won't work - I've been playing with it so this is just the concept of what I'm trying to achieve.
Basically my questions are: should I do it through join model somehow or use scopes?(also could you give a code snippet) and how do I do migration for that?
Thanks, and sorry I开发者_运维知识库 couldn't find much information on the web regarding this simple case.
Edit: has_and_belongs_to_many on User and Feed won't work in my case because it won't allow me to have @user.casts, it gives only @user.feeds and @feed.users
What you want is a many to many relationship between User and Feed.
You'll want something like this in your code for the User and Feed relationship to work.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :feeds
end
class Feed < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
You can read more about this in the Rails Guides - http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html#the-has_and_belongs_to_many-association
You may also want to look at using has_many :through with an intermediate model for this (explained here http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html#choosing-between-has_many-through-and-has_and_belongs_to_many) if you'd like to store any meta data for a user-feed relationship record.
Edit: I managed to get a similar setup working on 3.0 as well as 3.1 (using has_many :through).
Here are the contents of my models.
➜ app cat app/models/*
class Cast < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :feed
end
class Feed < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :subscriptions
has_many :casts
end
class Subscription < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :feed
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :subscriptions
has_many :feeds, :through => :subscriptions
# For 3.1
has_many :casts, :through => :feeds
# For 3.0
def casts
Cast.joins(:feed => :subscriptions).where("subscriptions.user_id" => self.id)
end
end
and here are the migrations I used
➜ app cat db/migrate/*
class CreateUsers < ActiveRecord::Migration
def self.up
create_table :users do |t|
t.string :name
t.timestamps
end
end
def self.down
drop_table :users
end
end
class CreateFeeds < ActiveRecord::Migration
def self.up
create_table :feeds do |t|
t.string :name
t.timestamps
end
end
def self.down
drop_table :feeds
end
end
class CreateCasts < ActiveRecord::Migration
def self.up
create_table :casts do |t|
t.string :name
t.integer :feed_id
t.timestamps
end
end
def self.down
drop_table :casts
end
end
class CreateSubscriptions < ActiveRecord::Migration
def self.up
create_table :subscriptions do |t|
t.integer :feed_id
t.integer :user_id
end
end
def self.down
drop_table :subscriptions
end
end
In http://railscasts.com/episodes/265-rails-3-1-overview Ryan Bates says that rails 3.1 has support for chained has_many :through calls. It's not possible in 3.0
精彩评论