In the source of Data/ByteString.hs
it says that the function findSubstrings
has been deprecated in favor of breakSubstring
. However I think the findSubstrings
which was implemented using the KMP algorithm is much more efficient than the algorithm used in breakSubstring
which is a naive one. Anybody has any idea why this has been done ?
Here's the old implementation:
{-# DEPRECATED findSubstrings "findSubstrings is deprecated in favour of breakSubstring." #-}
{-
{- This function uses the Knuth-Morris-Pratt string matching algorithm. -}
findSubstrings pat@(PS _ _ m) str@(PS _ _ n) = search 0 0
where
patc x = pat `unsafeIndex` x
strc x = str `unsafeIndex` x
-- maybe we should make kmpNext a UArray before using it in search?
kmpNext = listArray (0,m) (-1:kmpNextL pat (-1))
kmpNextL p _ | null p = []
kmpNextL p j = let j' = next (unsafeHead p) j + 1
开发者_运维百科 ps = unsafeTail p
x = if not (null ps) && unsafeHead ps == patc j'
then kmpNext Array.! j' else j'
in x:kmpNextL ps j'
search i j = match ++ rest -- i: position in string, j: position in pattern
where match = if j == m then [(i - j)] else []
rest = if i == n then [] else search (i+1) (next (strc i) j + 1)
next c j | j >= 0 && (j == m || c /= patc j) = next c (kmpNext Array.! j)
| otherwise = j
-}
And here's the new naive one:
findSubstrings :: ByteString -- ^ String to search for.
-> ByteString -- ^ String to seach in.
-> [Int]
findSubstrings pat str
| null pat = [0 .. length str]
| otherwise = search 0 str
where
STRICT2(search)
search n s
| null s = []
| pat `isPrefixOf` s = n : search (n+1) (unsafeTail s)
| otherwise = search (n+1) (unsafeTail s)
The reason for the change was that the implementation of KMP was actually more inefficient than the naive version, which is implemented with an eye on performance.
精彩评论