I have 3 tables. A base table, call it Table A, and two tables that reference Table A, Call them Table X and Table Y. Both X and Y have a foreign key contraint that references Table A. The Foreign Key of X and Y is also their own Pr开发者_Python百科imary Key.
I'd like to know if it is possible to add a constraint that will only allow one of these tables to contain a recrod that references Table A. So if X has a record that references A then Y can't have one and if Y has a record that references A then X can't have one.
Is this possible?
Thanks,
CHECK constraints with UDFs (which is Oded's answer) don't scale well and have poor concurrency. See these:
- Scalar UDFs wrapped in CHECK constraints are very slow and may fail for multirow updates
- Tony Rogerson
So:
- create a new table, say TableA2XY
- this has the PK of TableA and a char(1) column with a CHECK to allow ony X or Y. And a unique constraint on the PK of A too.
- tableX and tableY have new char(1) column with a check to allow only X or Y respectively
- tableX and tableY have their FK to TableA2XY on both columns
This is the superkey or subtype approach
- all DRI based
- no triggers
- no udfs with table access in CHECK constraints.
Yes, this is possible using CHECK constraints.
Apart from the normal foreign key constraint, you will need to add a CHECK constraint on both referencing tables to ensure that a foreign key is not used in the other referencing table.
精彩评论