I have a multicasting network that needs to continuously send data to all other users. This data will be changing constantly so I do not want the programmer to have to deal with the sending of packets to users. Because of this, I am trying to find out how I can make a reference to any object or variable in Python (I am new to Python) so it can be modified by the user and changes what is sent in the multicasting packets.
Here is an example of what I want:
>>> test = "test"
>>> mdc = MulticastDataClient()
>>> mdc.add(test) # added into an internal list that is sent to all users
# here we can see that we are successfully receiving the data
>>> print mdc.receive()
{'192.168.1.10_0': 'test'}
# now we try to change the value of test
>>> test = "this should change"
>>> print mdc.receive()
{'192.168.1.10_0': 'test'} # want 'test' to change to -> 'this should change'
Any help on how I can fix this would be very much appreciated.
UPDATE:
I have tried it this way as well:
>>> test = [1, "test"]
>>> mdc = MulticastDataClient()
>>> mdc.add(test)
>>> mdc.receive()
{'192.168.1.10_1': 'test'}
>>> test[1] = "change!"
>>> mdc.receive()
{'192.168.1.10_1': 'change开发者_JAVA百科!'}
This did work. However,
>>> val = "ftw!"
>>> nextTest = [4, val]
>>> mdc.add(nextTest)
>>> mdc.receive()
{'192.168.1.10_1': 'change!', '192.168.1.10_4': 'ftw!'}
>>> val = "different."
>>> mdc.receive()
{'192.168.1.10_1': 'change!', '192.168.1.10_4': 'ftw!'}
This does not work. I need 'ftw!' to become 'different.' in this case. I am using strings for testing and am used to strings being objects from other languages. I will only be editing the contents inside of an object so would this end up working?
In python everything is a reference, but strings are not mutable. So test
is holding a reference to "test". If you assign "this should change" to test
you just change it to another reference. But your clients still have the reference to "test". Or shorter: It does not work that way in python! ;-)
A solution might be to put the data into an object:
data = {'someKey':"test"}
mdc.add(data)
Now your clients hold a reference to the dictionary. If you update the dictionary like this, your clients will see the changes:
data['someKey'] = "this should change"
You can't, not easily. A name (variable) in Python is just a location for a pointer. Overwrite it and you just replace the pointer with another pointer, i.e. the change is only visible to people who use the same variable. Object members are basically the same, but as their state is seen by everyone with a pointer to them, you can propagate changes like this. You just have to use obj.var
every single time. Of course, strings (along with integers, tuples, a few other built-in types, and several other types) are immutable, i.e. you can't change anything about for others to see as you can't change it at all.
However, the mutability of objects opens another possibility: You could, if you bothered to pull it through, write a wrapper class that contains an arbitrary object, allows changing that object though a set()
method and delegates everything important to that object. You'd probably run into nasty little troubles sooner or later though. For example, I can't imagine this would play well with metaprogramming that goes through all members, or anything that thinks it has to mess with. It's also incredibly hacky (i.e. unreliable). There's probably a much easier solution.
(On a side note, PyPy has a become
function in one of its non-default object spaces that really and truly replaces one object with another, visible to everyone with a reference to that object. It doesn't work with any other implementations though and I think the incredible potential and misuse confusion as well as the fact most of us have rarely ever needed this makes it nearly unacceptable in real code.)
精彩评论