Poss开发者_如何学JAVAible Duplicate:
Convert 4 bytes to int
I'm trying to pack 4 bytes into an int using some of the solutions found here, but it doesn't seem to work for one of my tests.
This is the code I'm using:
public static int pack(int c1, int c2, int c3, int c4)
{
return (c1 << 24) | (c2 << 16) | (c3 << 8) | (c4);
}
Now when I use it on something simple like 0x34, 0x68, 0x77, and 0x23 I get what I expect: 0x34687723. But when I use it on 0xBA, 0xAD, 0xBE, and 0xEF I get something way off. Does anyone see what the problem might be?
EDIT
The above code was able to give me what I wanted, and the "wrong value" I mention below is just another way of representing 0xBAADBEEF in a decimal form.
Your code in the pack method is correct and preserves all bits but since the result is stored in a signed int you get a wrong result when you try to print it as an int or when you do arithmetic calculations or comparisons with it.
int result = pack( c1, c2, c3, c4 );
System.out.println( "result=" + Long.toHexString( result & 0xffffffffL );
This prints the int as a unsigned int.
A number stored in a Java int
can only represent positive values up to 0x7fffffff
(2147483647, Integer.MAX_VALUE
), as it's a signed type (like all Java number types), and in the internal representation the most significant bit is used as a sign bit.
To hold positive numeric values larger than that you need to use a long
instead:
public static long pack(int c1, int c2, int c3, int c4)
{
return ((c1 << 24) | (c2 << 16) | (c3 << 8) | (c4)) & 0xffffffffL;
}
Note the explicit long
mask operation at the end which is necessary to ensure that sign extension doesn't cause a negative integer result from being turned into a negative long.
Sign extension. In Java ints are signed, so 0xBA<<24 gets unhappy. I suggest that you pack into the last four bytes of a long
.
long temp =
((0xFF & c1) << 24) | ((0xFF & c2) << 16) | ((0xFF & c3) << 8) | (0xFF & c4);
return (int)(temp & 0x0FFFFFFFFL);
Are you getting a negative number? Perhaps an unsigned int or a longer int would work better.
精彩评论