I am refactoring a typing system (type model) I have in place that uses spirit for string-serialization. I am using the compile-time modeling construct of type-traits.
template<>
type_traits<int4_type>
{
typedef boost::spirit::qi::int_parser<boost::int32_t> string_parser;
}
template<>
type_traits<string_type>
{
typedef boost::spirit::ascii::string string_parser;
}
In this example I show primitive parsers, but I expect to put in rules as well.
The int4 type works, but that is because of (home/qi/numeric/int.hpp +27):
namespace tag
{
template <typename T, unsigned Radix, unsigned MinDigits
, int MaxDigits>
struct int_parser {};
}
namespace qi
{
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// This one is the class that the user can instantiate directly in
// order to create a customized int parser
template <typename T = int, unsigned Radix = 10, unsigned MinDigits = 1
, int MaxDigits = -1>
struct int_parser
: spirit::terminal<tag::int_parser<T, Radix, MinDigits, MaxDigits> >
{};
}
the string typedef doesn't work, and neither does eps. I couldn't figure out the why's of refering to the string parser. However, In the case of eps it boils down to:
#define BOOST_SPIRIT_TERMINAL(name) \
namespace tag { struct name {}; } \
typedef boost::proto::terminal<tag::name>::type开发者_运维问答 name##_type; \
name##_type const name = {{}}; \
inline void silence_unused_warnings__##name() { (void) name; } \
/***/
Which means I can't typedef it, it is a proto terminal construct, or put opaquely, a const global definition.
My question : How do I typedef a rule, grammar, primitive parser ?
Note : I have already started working on giving all my "types" a functor encapsulating a rule and then making that a type trait.
I'm not sure it will work in all case but what I did to typedef my Skipper was to use BOOST_TYPEOF :
typedef BOOST_TYPEOF(boost::spirit::ascii::space - (boost::spirit::qi::eol | boost::spirit::qi::eoi)) SkipperT;
so your example would be
typedef BOOST_TYPEOF(boost::spirit::ascii::string) string_parser;
There is probably a better / more elegant way but it currently work for what I needed it.
精彩评论