I've got a numpy
script that spends about 50% of its runtime in the following code:
s = numpy.dot(v1, v1)
where
v1 = v[1:]
and v
is a 4000-element 1D ndarray
of float64
stored in contiguous memory (v.strides
is (8,)
).
Any suggestions for speeding this up?
edit This is on Intel hardware. Here is the output of my numpy.show_config()
:
atlas_threads_info:
libraries = ['lapack', 'ptf77blas', 开发者_JAVA技巧'ptcblas', 'atlas']
library_dirs = ['/usr/local/atlas-3.9.16/lib']
language = f77
include_dirs = ['/usr/local/atlas-3.9.16/include']
blas_opt_info:
libraries = ['ptf77blas', 'ptcblas', 'atlas']
library_dirs = ['/usr/local/atlas-3.9.16/lib']
define_macros = [('ATLAS_INFO', '"\\"3.9.16\\""')]
language = c
include_dirs = ['/usr/local/atlas-3.9.16/include']
atlas_blas_threads_info:
libraries = ['ptf77blas', 'ptcblas', 'atlas']
library_dirs = ['/usr/local/atlas-3.9.16/lib']
language = c
include_dirs = ['/usr/local/atlas-3.9.16/include']
lapack_opt_info:
libraries = ['lapack', 'ptf77blas', 'ptcblas', 'atlas']
library_dirs = ['/usr/local/atlas-3.9.16/lib']
define_macros = [('ATLAS_INFO', '"\\"3.9.16\\""')]
language = f77
include_dirs = ['/usr/local/atlas-3.9.16/include']
lapack_mkl_info:
NOT AVAILABLE
blas_mkl_info:
NOT AVAILABLE
mkl_info:
NOT AVAILABLE
Your arrays are not very big, so ATLAS probably isn't doing much. What are your timings for the following Fortran program? Assuming ATLAS isn't doing much, this should give you a sense of how fast dot() could be if there was not any python overhead. With gfortran -O3 I get speeds of 5 +/- 0.5 us.
program test
real*8 :: x(4000), start, finish, s
integer :: i, j
integer,parameter :: jmax = 100000
x(:) = 4.65
s = 0.
call cpu_time(start)
do j=1,jmax
s = s + dot_product(x, x)
enddo
call cpu_time(finish)
print *, (finish-start)/jmax * 1.e6, s
end program test
Perhaps the culprit is copying of the arrays passed to dot.
As Sven said, the dot product relies on BLAS operations. These operations require arrays stored in contiguous C order. If both arrays passed to dot are in C_CONTIGUOUS, you ought to see better performance.
Of course, if your two arrays passed to dot are indeed 1D (8,) then you should see both the C_CONTIGUOUS AND F_CONTIGUOUS flags set to True; but if they are (1, 8), then you can see mixed order.
>>> w = NP.random.randint(0, 10, 100).reshape(100, 1)
>>> w.flags
C_CONTIGUOUS : True
F_CONTIGUOUS : False
OWNDATA : False
WRITEABLE : True
ALIGNED : True
UPDATEIFCOPY : False
An alternative: use _GEMM from BLAS, which is exposed through the module, scipy.linalg.fblas. (The two arrays, A and B, are obviously in Fortran order because fblas is used.)
from scipy.linalg import fblas as FB
X = FB.dgemm(alpha=1., a=A, b=B, trans_b=True)
Only thing I can think of to accelerate this is to make sure your NumPy installation is compiled against an optimized BLAS library (like ATLAS). numpy.dot()
is one of only a few NumPy functions that make use of BLAS.
numpy.dot will use multithreading if compiled correctly. Make sure that it does with top. I know of cases where people didn't get multithreading in numpy w/ atlas to work. Furthermore, it's worth trying to use a numpy version that is compiled against the intel mkl libraries. They include blas routines that are supposed to be faster than atlas on intel hardware. You could give enthought's python distro a try. Contains all this and is free for people with an edu email account.
精彩评论