public ActionResult ActionName()
{
List<BookType> bookList = GetAvailableBookList();
// some code
return View("RelatedView");
}
private List<BookType> GetAvailableBookList()
{
....
list = GetList();
if(list.Count == 0)
{
System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Response.Redirect(messagePageUrl, true);
}
else return list;
}
Unfortunately, Response.Redirect()
isn't really friendly with ASP.NET MVC. My rule of thumb is if it comes from HttpContext I don't want to touch it in the controller (of course there are many exceptions to that rule) -- especially since it improves testability.
My suggestion is to use RedirectToAction
, but since you don't want to repeat code you can do it in such a way that you don't have to repeat code (although in this case I don't see a problem with repeating code).
public ActionResult LoadBookListAndContinue(
Func<List<BookType>, ActionResult> continuation)
{
var list = LoadBooklist();
if(list.Any())
{
return action(continuation);
}
return new RedirectResult(messagePageUrl);
}
// in your controller
public ActionResult ActionName()
{
return LoadBookListAndContinue(
list => {
// some code
return View("RelatedView");
});
}
Is it pretty? No, but it works better than the Redirect exception.
Use
return RedirectToAction("NoListAvailable");
if you have a specific action you would like to execute. The NoListAvailable action can return a view indicating the problem.
Alternatively, you could return the view directly
return View("NoListAvailable");
The exception you are getting is probably ThreadAbortException and this is something you cannot avoid unless you allow the thread to continue (2nd argument in Response.Redirect).
On a side note your current solution is generally flawed. You should use RedirectToAction in each action when your method returns an empty list.
Throwing a specific exception and redirect where you catch it may be solution
Try to write
System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Response.Redirect(messagePageUrl, false);
精彩评论