Apologies for the fairly unhelpful title, if you have a better suggestion please feel free to edit it.
I'm using CakePHP and the bake functionality (I don't need to bake however).
What's the best way of achieving the following:
table schema:
table ranges
id | name | description
table images
id | range_id | picture
table info (here i am confused)
id | range_id | height | width | colour
Basically, one range may have 开发者_StackOverflow社区many images (1:Many). I can show this fine.
Now, each range will have an entry in the info
table (1:1) and some attributes about the range such as height, colour, width. But not always...
Let's say I have a range foo
. foo
has five images
that all have the same height, width and colour. However, foo
has one image that is a different size and a different colour.
When the attributes differ, I need to show this information with the respective image, rather than the ranges
default information. So this image
will need it's own entry in the info
table.
Does this even make sense? Or am I going about this entirely the wrong way.
My application, in brief: (If it helps, think of "range" as a product)
- User selects a range
- User views images in the range
- User can click an image, and the information from
info
pops up about that range. - Some images have different attributes, but still belong to the same range.
- How can I make this distinction and store it appropriately?
Please let me know if I can clarify further. Thank you.
I've needed to do this on occasion where a parent entity has a value that can get "overridden" by a child entity.
There are a couple of approaches you can take the structure being the easiest part.
consider the following structure
table ranges
id | name | description | default_info_id
table images
id | range_id | picture | info_id
table info
id | height | width | colour
When does image.info_id have a value? There are two choices
Populate the image.info_id with the default_info_id from the parent. The user can then override it on the image
Pros
- You never need to look at the Range to figure out what the info is on the image
Cons
- you need to decide what to do when the range.default_info_id changes. does it effect the images or is it just for future
Only Populate the images.info_id when its different than the parent.
Pros
- If the parents.default_info_id changes when images.info_id is null it will automatically change as well
Cons
you need to decide what to do when the range.default_info_id changes. Do you need to now null out any images.info_id that are now the same as the parent?
You need to look at the rages table to figure out what the info_id is on the images when its null.
You can have several varieties of the above data structures but you'll still need to figure when to populate what. Here are two others you could consider that are valid (but less optimal in my opinion)
Info has an FK to both tables but one is always null
table ranges
id | name | description
table images
id | range_id | picture
table info
id | range_id | image_id | height | width | colour
No Info Table at all
table ranges
id | name | description | default_height | default_width | default_colour
table images
id | range_id | picture | height | width | colour
精彩评论