For example, would this:
while (true) {
var random = Math.rand开发者_运维知识库om();
}
... be less efficient than the following, in most implementations?
var random;
while (true) {
random = Math.random();
}
Thanks for your input.
Edit: In case it wasn't obvious, I'm mostly worried about lots of repeated (de)allocations occurring in this example.
JavaScript does not have block scoping.
In the first example, the var text
declaration is hoisted out of the while
block. In both cases, the variable is declared only once. In both cases, the variable is assigned a value once per iteration of the while
loop.
var
function
-scoped- hoist to the top of its function
- redeclarations of the same name in the same scope are no-ops
No, variables are initiated upon entry into the scope, so random
exists before the var statement is even reached.
JavaScript doesn't have block scope, and random
's declaration would be hoisted to the top of its scope anyway (variable object).
This depends on the implementation of the interpreter. Strictly speaking, yes, it may have a slightly higher overhead; but depending on the GC mechanism this should be cleared reasonably quickly too.
Douglas Crockford recommends putting all the var assignments at the top of a function, i.e. outwith any loops.
精彩评论