开发者

Android, ProGuard, and keepclasseswithmembernames

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-02-28 17:44 出处:网络
A common pattern in ProGuard configs for Android applications is to preserve custom View classes, since they are probably referenced only from layout XML instead of application code.

A common pattern in ProGuard configs for Android applications is to preserve custom View classes, since they are probably referenced only from layout XML instead of application code.

Upon project creation, the ADT therefore add these rules to a project's proguard.cfg:

-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
   public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet);
}

-keepclasseswithmembernames class * {
   public <init>(android.content.Context, android.util.AttributeSet, int);
}

I guess the idea here is to say that whenever a class defines a constructor that may be called by a layout inflater, then preserve it. However, according to the ProGuard docs, the keepclasseswithmembernames qualifier is shorthand for keepclasseswithmembers and allowshrinking, which if I understand correctly means: it's allowed to remove these classes, but if they're kept, don't obfuscate its member names (probably to not break bindings between XML attribute names and class setters).

But doesn't that mean that those classes will still be removed during the shrinking phase (allowshrinking = true), unless they are referenced directly in code? Indeed that is what happened with a custom widget we're using in our app, and I开发者_运维百科 could fix the issue by setting the rule to just keepclasseswithmembers since that will simply preserve the matching classes entirely (it's worth noting that this is what the official ProGuard Android example does, too).

Am I misreading the ProGuard docs or is this a bug in the ADT project wizard?


The configuration in the Android SDK (at least up to version 11) is not entirely correct, indeed.

The configuration for Android in the ProGuard documentation correctly specifies "-keepclasseswithmembers", not "-keepclasseswithmembernames".


When I first tried the integrated proguard with Ant, my app kept crashing with runtime errors on the clickhandlers. (I always set these in XML). I assumed I must be doing something wrong, couldn't work out what, so added the line

-dontshrink

at the top of the proguard.cfg.

Maybe this isn't optimal but it stopped the run time errors!

Addendum

In fact I checked this by looking at usage.txt. The clickhandlers were listed in there before I added the dontshrink option, after I added it, usage.txt was empty as would be expected.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消