开发者

Python: Mock side_effect on object attribute

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-02-28 14:38 出处:网络
Is it possible to have a side_effect on a property? If I look at the Mock documentation it seems it\'s only possible on object methods.

Is it possible to have a side_effect on a property? If I look at the Mock documentation it seems it's only possible on object methods.

I am trying to test the following:

def get_object(self): 
    try:
        r开发者_Python百科eturn self.request.user.shop
    except Shop.DoesNotExist:
        return None

I want Shop to raise a DoesNotExist exception.

Guess maybe I wasn't clear enough but I am talking about the voidspace mock library.

http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/mock/index.html


It's worth noting that there is now the PropertyMock class:

>>> m = MagicMock()
>>> p = PropertyMock(side_effect=ValueError)
>>> type(m).foo = p
>>> m.foo
Traceback (most recent call last):
....
ValueError

That example was taken from the official site.


You can also try to patch the related field using a PropertyMock as new_callable argument.

Example:

from unittest import TestCase
import mock
from django import models
from django.core.exceptions import ObjectDoesNotExist

class Foo(models.Model):
    # ...
    @property
    def has_pending_related(self):
        try:
            return self.related_field.is_pending
        except ObjectDoesNotExist:
            return False

class FooTestCase(TestCase):
    # ...
    @mock.patch.object(Foo, 'related_field', new_callable=mock.PropertyMock)
    def test_pending_related(self, related_field):
        related_field.side_effect = ObjectDoesNotExist
        foo = Foo()
        self.assertFalse(foo.has_pending_related)


Yes, you can use a property for it:

In [1]: class ShopDoesNotExist(Exception):
   ...:     pass
   ...:

In [2]: class User(object):
   ...:     @property
   ...:     def shop(self):
   ...:         raise ShopDoesNotExist
   ...:
   ...:

In [3]: u = User()

In [4]: u.shop
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ShopDoesNotExist                          Traceback (most recent call last)


The author made a blog post about this problem. I went for the first solution which looks like this:

class UserMock(Mock):
    @property
    def shop(self):
        raise Shop.DoesNotExist()

http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/weblog/arch_d7_2010_11_20.shtml#e1196


As an aside, if you're trying to test for AttributeError as an side_effect you can use spec parameter and set it to empty list (i.e. []). Say you're trying to create a Mock object that throws an AttributeError when accessing attribute foo:

from unittest.mock import Mock
m = Mock(spec = [])
m.foo

# AttributeError: Mock object has no attribute 'foo'

See Documentation:

spec: This can be either a list of strings or an existing object (a class or instance) that acts as the specification for the mock object. If you pass in an object then a list of strings is formed by calling dir on the object (excluding unsupported magic attributes and methods). Accessing any attribute not in this list will raise an AttributeError.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消

关注公众号