Is it possible to have a side_effect on a property? If I look at the Mock documentation it seems it's only possible on object methods.
I am trying to test the following:
def get_object(self):
try:
r开发者_Python百科eturn self.request.user.shop
except Shop.DoesNotExist:
return None
I want Shop to raise a DoesNotExist exception.
Guess maybe I wasn't clear enough but I am talking about the voidspace mock library.
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/mock/index.html
It's worth noting that there is now the PropertyMock
class:
>>> m = MagicMock()
>>> p = PropertyMock(side_effect=ValueError)
>>> type(m).foo = p
>>> m.foo
Traceback (most recent call last):
....
ValueError
That example was taken from the official site.
You can also try to patch the related field using a PropertyMock as new_callable argument.
Example:
from unittest import TestCase
import mock
from django import models
from django.core.exceptions import ObjectDoesNotExist
class Foo(models.Model):
# ...
@property
def has_pending_related(self):
try:
return self.related_field.is_pending
except ObjectDoesNotExist:
return False
class FooTestCase(TestCase):
# ...
@mock.patch.object(Foo, 'related_field', new_callable=mock.PropertyMock)
def test_pending_related(self, related_field):
related_field.side_effect = ObjectDoesNotExist
foo = Foo()
self.assertFalse(foo.has_pending_related)
Yes, you can use a property for it:
In [1]: class ShopDoesNotExist(Exception):
...: pass
...:
In [2]: class User(object):
...: @property
...: def shop(self):
...: raise ShopDoesNotExist
...:
...:
In [3]: u = User()
In [4]: u.shop
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ShopDoesNotExist Traceback (most recent call last)
The author made a blog post about this problem. I went for the first solution which looks like this:
class UserMock(Mock):
@property
def shop(self):
raise Shop.DoesNotExist()
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/weblog/arch_d7_2010_11_20.shtml#e1196
As an aside, if you're trying to test for AttributeError
as an side_effect
you can use spec
parameter and set it to empty list (i.e. []
). Say you're trying to create a Mock
object that throws an AttributeError
when accessing attribute foo
:
from unittest.mock import Mock
m = Mock(spec = [])
m.foo
# AttributeError: Mock object has no attribute 'foo'
See Documentation:
spec: This can be either a list of strings or an existing object (a class or instance) that acts as the specification for the mock object. If you pass in an object then a list of strings is formed by calling dir on the object (excluding unsupported magic attributes and methods). Accessing any attribute not in this list will raise an AttributeError.
精彩评论