开发者

Difference between signed and unsigned data types?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-02-27 03:05 出处:网络
main() { char i=255; printf(\"\\n%x\\n\",i); } output:ffffffff main() { u_char i=255; printf(\"\\n%x\\n\",i); }
main()
{
    char i=255;
    printf("\n%x\n",i);
}

output:ffffffff

main()
{
    u_char i=255;
    printf("\n%x\n",i);
}

output:ff

What is 开发者_运维百科happening here? Kindly explain the output to me with some good links. This is a very basic thing I guess and I am getting really confused...


What you are seeing here is caused by two things:

  • 255 does not fit in the range of char (note that it is implementation-defined whether char is equivalent to signed char or unsigned char, but evidently on your platform it is signed char). The resulting behaviour is implementation-defined, but typically it will wrap round and become -1; see two's complement.
  • integer promotion, because printf() is a variable-argument function. Integral-type arguments (like char) are automatically promoted to int.

So printf() sees an int with a value of -1, and prints its hexadecimal representation accordingly.

For the unsigned case, there is no wrap-around. printf() sees an int with a value of 255, and prints its hexadecimal representation accordingly (omitting the leading zeros).


The C compiler has to expand the value passed to printf (this is called "promotion"), because printf is a variadic function (it can be called with differing arguments). For values of type char, the promoted value is of type int. Since your compiler's char type seems to be signed, the promoted value is sign extended. In binary:

char i = 255           // or: 11111111 in binary
int promoted_i = -1    // or: 11....11111 (usually, 32 or 64 ones)

In the unsigned case, no sign-extension happens:

char u = 255           // or: 11111111 in binary, same as above but with different interpretation
unsigned int pu = i    // or: 00....0011111111 (8 ones, preceded by the appropriate number of zeroes) 


char i = 255; invokes implementation-defined behavior by converting a value to a signed type into which it does not fit (assuming char is only 8 bits and plain char is signed, both of which are also implementation-specific.


When you set an 8-bit signed variable to the value 255, which it can't hold, it seems in this case it sets the negative (high-end) flag to 1, so the value would be -1 if it were signed, but then it gets converted to an integer -1 which is ffffffff.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消