开发者

When and how often to call processPendingChanges to ensure graph integrity

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-02-27 01:36 出处:网络
I have 开发者_开发技巧entities that are managed by Core Data and have several cases where, within a single method, I set some attribute values that will result graph changes that Core Data will enforc

I have 开发者_开发技巧entities that are managed by Core Data and have several cases where, within a single method, I set some attribute values that will result graph changes that Core Data will enforce and perform additional actions that (logically) depend on uptodate state for the graph.

Is there any reason not to call processPendingChanges after each time a relationship is set, to ensure that the graph is always fully uptodate? Everything works as it should when I do this, but, clearly, it's a bit "noisy", and breaks up some processing that would otherwise be notifications (e.g, fetched results controllers that end up sending lots of controllerWillChangeContent/controllerDidChangeContent to their deligates when one would otherwise have happened).

ADDITION:

Will the graph always be up-to-date after a return from any method that makes changes to an entity?


I found it the hard way that you should call processPendingChanges before inspecting deletedObjects of NSManagedObjectContext. At least if some relationships have deleteRule set to NSCascadeDeleteRule.

If you don't call processPendingChanges then deletedObjects may not contain objects that will be deleted by cascade at the end of current event.


processPendingChanges is most often used on iOS with multiple context operating on seperate threads. It plays a bigger and more common role under MacOS.

You usually don't have to call it under iOS in most circumstances. Doing so doesn't really give you much of an advantage and it can cause lags in the UI when executed on the main thread if you have a complex graph.

I wouldn't bother with it unless testing reveals you are loosing graph integrity for some reason.

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消