Do I really get any benefit out of doing the following (as opposed to just putting the actual regex in place of the ${pcr} in both if statements)? (alot more lines are in the real data set but just using DATA for example.
my $defs = 0;
my $tests = 0;
my $pcr = qr/\s*[\/\\]?\s*/;
while (<DATA>)
{
$defs 开发者_如何学编程= ($1 ? 0 : 1) if /<(${pcr})definitions/;
$tests = ($1 ? 0 : 1) if /<(${pcr})tests/;
print "defs: $defs\ntests: $tests\n\n";
}
__DATA__
<what>
</what>
<definitions>
<one />
</definitions>
<tests>
<two />
<three />
</tests>
Running some benchmarks against your original example, an example without PCR, and another example where two different PCR's are used for definitions
and tests
, which are defined outside the loop, I get the following results for half a million iterations on my machine:
Rate no_pcr orig pcr_before
no_pcr 130208/s -- -1% -5%
orig 131579/s 1% -- -4%
pcr_before 137741/s 6% 5% --
So it would seem that either there isn't any benefit, or the benefit is very small.
Using perl's 'times' to get the cpu times before and after the following loops shows me that, for some reason, the precompiled regex version is actually about 33% slower than the inline regex. I did the regex match twice to be close to the example code and to prevent any mysterious perl optimization across loop runs.
for (1..$num_runs) {
$test_string =~ $pcr;
$test_string =~ $pcr;
}
and
for(1..$num_runs) {
$test_string =~ m/\s*[\/\\]?\s*/;
$test_string =~ m/\s*[\/\\]?\s*/;
}
With $num_runs
being 10,000,000 and $pcr
and $test_string
being the following:
my $pcr = qr/\s*[\/\\]?\s*/;
my $test_string = '<what>';
The cpu times after finding the delta and averaging were:
------------------------------
Precompiled regex:
------------------------------
user : 0.0000040190
system : 0.0000000010
------------------------------
Inline regex:
------------------------------
user : 0.0000030580
system : 0.0000000000
I did not use perl's Benchmark.pm for personal reasons. I've seen it give obviously wrong numbers and, while they were minimal, benchmarking is pointless if you've got numbers you can't trust. These numbers I can trust, though the tests I benchmarked might need to be reevaluated.
精彩评论