I have a function that returns a list. When I know the number of elements in the list I can do something like:
x,y,z=foo()
however, the number of elements in the list can vary. I would like to do something like
x,y*=foo()
where x would contain the first element in the returned list and y* would contain the remainder of however many elements there are left. Obviously , this syntax is not sup开发者_如何转开发ported in Python. Is there a philosophical reason for this? Am I thinking about this the wrong way?
thanks in advance.
There is no philosophical objection to your syntax, in fact, it's supported in Python 3.1:
>>> a, *b = range(10)
>>> a
0
>>> b
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
>>> # Or even more flexibly:
>>> a, *b, c = range(10)
>>> a
0
>>> b
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
>>> c
9
>>>
A slightly generalized approach:
>>> def unpack(seq, count):
... return seq[:count] + [seq[count:]]
>>> a, b = unpack([1, 2, 3], 1)
>>> a
1
>>> b
[2, 3]
>>> a, b = unpack([1, 2], 1)
>>> a
1
>>> b
[2]
>>> a, b = unpack([1], 1)
>>> a
1
>>> b
[]
>>> a, b = unpack([], 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: need more than 1 value to unpack
>>> a, b, c, d = unpack(range(10), 3)
>>> a
0
>>> b
1
>>> c
2
>>> d
[3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Like this
results = foo()
x= results[0]
y= results[1:]
Or change your function to return a two-tuple
def foo():
....
return someList[0], someList[1:]
What you need to do is to return a list
e.g. return [ ... ]
You then receive the list and find its length e.g. abc=f(.....)
len(abc) would give you the number of elements in the list
for iiabc in abc: would allow you to access each of the elements
精彩评论