Here is the code...
use strict;
use warnings;
my @array= (1,2,3,4,5);
my $scalar= 5;
@array= $scalar*@array;
print @array;
Need something that can perform similar function wi开发者_StackOverflow社区th little code. Thanks!
Use foreach.
foreach my $x (@array) { $x = $x * $scalar; }
You can try this:
@array = map { $_ * $scalar } @array;
or more simply:
map { $_ *= $scalar } @array;
Howabout this:
foreach(@array)
{ $_ *= $scalar }
As you see, you can modify the array in-place as it's traversed.
I don't know the scope of your need. IFF you are doing numerical data manipulation, the Perl Data Language (PDL) takes an array of numerical data, creates a "piddle" object from it and overloads mathematical operations to "vectorize" their operation. This is a very efficient system for doing numerical processing. Anyway here is an example:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use PDL;
my $pdl_array = pdl([1,1,2,3,5,8]);
print 2*$pdl_array;
__END__
gives:
[2 2 4 6 10 16]
This comment is for SoloBold.
Here is a test of the map
approach:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Benchmark;
my @array = ();
push(@array, (1) x 1000000);
my $scalar = 5;
my $startTime = new Benchmark();
@array = map { $_ * $scalar } @array;
my $stopTime = new Benchmark();
print STDOUT "runtime: ".timestr(timediff($stopTime, $startTime), 'all')." sec\n";
Here is a test of the foreach
approach:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Benchmark;
my @array = ();
push(@array, (1) x 1000000);
my $scalar = 5;
my $startTime = new Benchmark();
foreach my $x (@array) { $x = $x * $scalar; }
my $stopTime = new Benchmark();
print STDOUT "runtime: ".timestr(timediff($stopTime, $startTime), 'all')." sec\n";
Here is the system I'm running on:
bash-3.2$ perl --version
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for darwin-2level
...
bash-3.2$ uname -a
Darwin Sounder.local 10.7.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.7.0: Sat Jan 29 15:17:16 PST 2011; root:xnu-1504.9.37~1/RELEASE_I386 i386
Here were results from one test:
bash-3.2$ ./test.map.pl
runtime: 4 wallclock secs ( 0.41 usr 0.70 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 1.11 CPU) sec
bash-3.2$ ./test.foreach.pl
runtime: 0 wallclock secs ( 0.13 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.13 CPU) sec
These times are fairly reproducible on the same machine, and the results are somewhat repeatable on a dual-core Linux box:
[areynolds@fiddlehead ~]$ perl --version
This is perl, v5.8.8 built for x86_64-linux-thread-multi
...
[areynolds@fiddlehead ~]$ uname -a
Linux fiddlehead.example.com 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 #1 SMP Mon Sep 20 07:12:06 EDT 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[areynolds@fiddlehead ~]$ ./test.map.pl
runtime: 0 wallclock secs ( 0.28 usr 0.05 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.33 CPU) sec
[areynolds@fiddlehead ~]$ ./test.foreach.pl
runtime: 0 wallclock secs ( 0.09 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.09 CPU) sec
The ratio of performance on the OS X box is 8.53x slower for map
versus foreach
. On the Linux box, 3.67x slower for the same.
My Linux box is dual-core and has a slightly faster cores than my single-core OS X laptop.
EDIT
I updated Perl from v5.8.8 to v5.12.3 on my OS X box and got a considerable speed boost, but map
still performed worse than foreach
:
sounder:~ alexreynolds$ perl --version
This is perl 5, version 12, subversion 3 (v5.12.3) built for darwin-multi-2level
...
sounder:~ alexreynolds$ ./test.map.pl
runtime: 0 wallclock secs ( 0.45 usr 0.08 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.53 CPU) sec
sounder:~ alexreynolds$ ./test.foreach.pl
runtime: 1 wallclock secs ( 0.18 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.18 CPU) sec
This goes from 8.53x worse to 2.94x worse. A fairly substantial improvement.
The Linux box performed slightly worse with upgrading its Perl installation to v5.12.2:
[areynolds@basquiat bin]$ perl --version
This is perl 5, version 12, subversion 2 (v5.12.2) built for x86_64-linux-thread-multi
...
[areynolds@basquiat bin]$ /home/areynolds/test.map.pl
runtime: 1 wallclock secs ( 0.29 usr 0.07 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.36 CPU) sec
[areynolds@basquiat bin]$ /home/areynolds/test.foreach.pl
runtime: 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.00 sys + 0.00 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.08 CPU) sec
This goes from 3.67x worse to 4.5x worse — not so good! It might not always pay to upgrade, just for the heck of it.
it seem unfortunate to me that Larry didn't allow
$scalar operator (list)
or
(list) operator $scalar
Sure map or loops can do it, but the syntax is so much cleaner like above.
Also (list) operator (list)
makes sense too if the 2 are equal length.
Surprised Larry didn't allow these, just saying.. I guess in this case there were (n-1) ways to do it.
Like
my @a = 'n' . (1..5); my @a = 2 * (1..5);
or even my @a = 2 * @b;
精彩评论