Inspired by this (excellent) discussion of using Promises in javascript, I'm trying to work out how I could use Deferred to chain together async and non-async functions, to avoid paying the callback tax when using my 'Global storage' code.
I've got a few questions related to this, but I'll ask them together here, because the context is the same.
One thing I can't work out is how I can make a deferred out of something that isn't asynchronous - that is, how do I take a value, wrap it in a promise, and return it directly? (a -> M<a>
)
Also, how can I take an asynchronous function and wrap it so that it returns its result directly, but wrapped in a promise? ((a -> b) -> (a -> M<b>)
)
Last question, for monadic fre开发者_Go百科aks - is there a standard name for this function? [a] -> (a -> M<b>) -> M<[b]>
Wrapping a value into a promise is as simple as using $.when:
var promise = $.when( value );
Also, as of jQuery 1.6, you have a very simple chaining method (pipe):
var chained = functionThatReturnsAPromise().pipe(function( resolveValue ) {
return functionThatReturnsAnotherPromise( resolveValue );
});
chained.done(function() {
// Both asynchronous operations done in sequence
});
Hope this helps.
I think the way that you'd turn a value into a Promise is to just "pre-succeed" the Deferred:
function v2p(value) {
var rv = $.Deferred();
rv.resolveWith(null, [value]);
return rv.promise();
}
Now passing a function to ".done()" will result in the function being immediately called with the value.
v2p("hello").done(function(value) { alert(value); });
would immediately alert "hello".
Helped along by @Pointy, implementing 'lift' becomes trivial:
function unit(value) {
var rv = $.Deferred();
rv.resolveWith(null, [value]);
return rv.promise();
}
function lift(fn) {
return function(x) {
return unit(fn(x));
};
}
lift(alert)("hello");
function bind(fn) {
return function(x) {
return x.done(function(y) { return fn(y); });
}
}
function compose(f, g) { return function(x) { g(f(x)); } };
function twice(x) { return 2 * x; }
var alert2 = compose(bind(lift(twice)), bind(lift(alert)));
alert2(unit(4)); //error at the end because alert doesn't return any values
Now I just have to work out how to implement [a] -> (a -> M<b>) -> M<[b]>
, and what to call it!
EDIT, I ended up implementing (a -> M<b>) -> ([a] -> M<[b]>)
instead, it looks like this:
function listBind(fn) {
return function(a) {
var Mb = $.Deferred();
var b = [], pending = a.length;
var callback = function(i,val) {
b[i] = val;
if(--pending == 0) Mb.resolve(b);
};
for(var i = 0, n = a.length; i < n; i++) {
(function(closure) { //ugly, but have to use closure to 'copy' i
fn(a[closure]).done(function(val) { callback(closure, val); })
})(i);
}
return Mb.promise();
};
}
So, given a function which gets one deferred item, this function listBind returns a new function which accepts an array of values, and uses them to return another list of values inside a deferred item.
精彩评论