I've encountered in an example for a system verilog code decleration of inputs and outputs for a module
without stating their type, e.g log开发者_JAVA百科ic
, wire
...
module mat_to_stream (
input [2:0] [2:0] [2:0] a,b,
input newdata,
input rst, clk,
output [2:0] [7:0] A_out, B_out);
...rest of code...
What is the diffrence between stating logic
and not stating any type?
There is no difference between stating logic
and not stating any type.
input newdata,
is equivalent to
input logic newdata,
The SystemVerilog IEEE Std (1800-2009) describes this in section: "23.2.2.3 Rules for determining port kind, data type and direction".
It is very common to not assign inputs a data type, as they should almost always be wire
.
input [7:0] newdata
Is nominally equivalent to:
input wire [7:0] newdata
It is actually picking up `default_nettype wire
which could be changed to say uwire
to enforce compiler checks for unique drivers, which will fail on wiring mistakes with multiple drives.
Using logic
as a type allows the auto selection between wire
and reg
which is useful for outputs and allows easier refracting. Inputs can never be reg
type.
Stuart Sutherlands SNUG2013 paper, section 12 covers how uwire
could be used to better imply design intent if it was supported correctly by the tools.
From, SystemVerilog IEEE Std (1800-2017) describes this in section: "23.2.2.3 Rules for determining port kind, data type and direction"
精彩评论