Hey :) I am currently developing a memoryhacking-library for x86/x64 Linux. The point I struggle is to implement some kind of remote syscall execution.
Here is my code which just crashes the other process when I attempt to execute a valid syscall.
(All of my functions used within the code are wrappers around ptrace) You can find the complete code here: http://code.google.com/p/ethonmem/source/browse/
long Debugger::executeSyscall(
unsigned long code, std::vector<unsigned long> const& args) const
{
// Backup registers.
Registers buRegs = getRegisters(buRegs);
FpuRegisters buFregs = getFpuRegisters(buFregs);
// Get register set to modify.
Registers regs = buRegs;
#if __WORDSIZE == 32
// EAX stores the syscall code.
regs.eax = code;
// If less than 7 args exist, they are stored in registers.
size_t argCount = args.size();
if(argCount < 7)
{
while(argCount)
{
switch(argCount)
{
case 1:
regs.ebx = args[0];
break;
case 2:
regs.ecx = args[1];
break;
case 3:
regs.edx = args[2];
break;
case 4:
regs.esi = args[3];
break;
case 5:
regs.edi = args[4];
break;
case 6:
regs.ebp = args[5];
break;
}
--argCount;
}
}
// Otherwise we have to use memory.
else
{
// Get stack space.
regs.esp -= argCount * sizeof(unsigned long);
// Write arguments to stack.
for(size_t i = 0; i < argCount; ++i)
writeWord(regs.esp + i * sizeof(unsigned long), args[i]);
// EBX stores the address.
regs.ebx = regs.esp;
}
// Write INT 0x80-instruction to current instruction pointer position.
unsigned long const oldInstruction = readWord(regs.eip);
uint8_t newInstruction[sizeof(long)] = { 0xCD, 0x80, 0xCC, 0xCC };
writeWord(regs.eip, *reinterpret_cast<unsigned long*>(&newInstruction[0]));
#elif __WORDSIZE == 64
// RAX stores the syscall code.
regs.rax = code;
// If less than 7 args exist, they are stored in registers.
size_t argCount = args.size();
if(argCount < 7)
{
while(argCount)
{
switch(argCount)
{
case 1:
regs.rdi = args[0];
break;
case 2:
regs.rsi = args[1];
break;
case 3:
regs.rdx = args[2];
break;
开发者_开发技巧 case 4:
regs.r10 = args[3]; // Or RCX ???
break;
case 5:
regs.r8 = args[4];
break;
case 6:
regs.r9 = args[5];
break;
}
--argCount;
}
}
// Otherwise this fails.
else
{
BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION(EthonError() <<
ErrorString("More than 6 arguments passed to a 64bit syscall"));
}
// Write SYSCALL-instruction to current instruction pointer position.
unsigned long const oldInstruction = readWord(regs.rip);
uint8_t newInstruction[sizeof(long)] =
{ 0x0F, 0x05, 0xCC, 0xCC, 0xCC, 0xCC, 0xCC, 0xCC };
writeWord(regs.rip, *reinterpret_cast<unsigned long*>(&newInstruction[0]));
#endif
// Apply new registers.
setRegisters(regs);
// Step to begin of syscall.
stepSyscall();
// Step to end of syscall.
stepSyscall();
// Fetch return value and restore patched word
getRegisters(regs);
long returnValue;
#if __WORDSIZE == 32
returnValue = regs.eax;
writeWord(regs.eip, oldInstruction);
#elif __WORDSIZE == 64
returnValue = regs.rax;
writeWord(regs.rip, oldInstruction);
#endif
// Restore registers.
setRegisters(buRegs);
setFpuRegisters(buFregs);
return returnValue;
}
Is anyone able to detect my error? Thank you :) Regards, Florian
Do you know whether %rip has been incremented to the next instruction when the syscall happens? Normally after an e8 or e9 (call/jmp), and possibly after a 0f05 syscall, %rip points to the address after the call, instead of to it directly. Using %rip - 2 might fix it.
Just a wild guess, do you make sure any memory adresses passed as argument with syscall are valid?
精彩评论