Is it better to start learning C# or C++ in the .NET world? [closed]_问答_开发者

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 11 years ago.

I have some very rusty C++ and lots of C experience, but have done little OO design or coding. I've started learning C++.N开发者_如何学编程ET as that seemed to be the best starting point.

I've hit restrictions in Microsoft's provision with multiple inheritance and extensions, neither work in C++.

Would I be better off starting again with C#, or am I better off using a mixed language approach. eg. extensions in C#, rest in C++?

I'm still struggling with this->method or that.property and theother::staticthingy or whatever, and this probably is not an issue in C#. You'll see what I mean as that probably isn't the right way to desribe the difference between '->' '.' and '::'

I'm getting to achieve what I want, but it's taking me 10 times longer than I think it should.

Is C# any quicker?

MS wants you to use C#, so use C#. If your C++ is rusty, you'll end up wasting time learning a difficult language, which is actually a second class citizen in the .NET world.

However, C++ in the .NET world (called C++/CLI) is a wonderful tool to wrap existing non-.NET code into .NET classes.

For the multiple inheritance thing, C# supports inheriting multiple interfaces (à la Java), which is by far the most useful use case of multiple inheritance.

If you plan on going the .NET route I would personally recommend going the C# route. I see a greater number of support for C# related question and more code examples geared towards .NET. That is just from personal experience. C# is the highest traffic tag on stack overflow.

I think C# is a bit more sane that C++. However, you're still not going to get multiple inheritance.

That said, be sure to pick the right tool for the job. If you absolutely need C++ (and this is becoming more rare every day) then stick with it.

Otherwise, save your sanity and move to C#.

if you got good knowledge in C then C# should be more interesting and easy.

Though I believe this is more a programmers.SE question, here's my $.02.

I would start with C++. Build an appreciation and understanding for memory management, structures, cleanup, etc. then move to .NET. The Garbage Collector (GC) is nice, but going in to a language that's that "loose" with structure and beginning (IMHO) sets for a poor foundation moving forward.

If you understand what's going on in the background, you'll have a better mind set when developing (keeping a conscience mind of memory and resources).

Just my belief, anyways.

If you want to get into AAA gaming (or a job that requires C++) start learning C++.

Otherwise, C# is much newer and well refined, making it easier/quicker to learn (imo)

C# is a very easy-to-grasp language. I first learned unmanaged C++ a long time ago, and honestly C++ syntax has changed so much since then I don't recognize it anymore. Before I started programming in C# regularly, my previous C-ish language had been Java, and if you know Java, you can learn C# very easily. Also, from a business perspective, C# is by far the most popular .NET language in terms of how many people want C# programmers, as opposed to VB, C++.NET or F# programmers.

In C#, there is no syntactic difference between, for instance, a member of a class referenced by a pointer, and a member of a class instantiated locally, because in C#, pointers, though they exist, are hidden behind a LOT of abstraction. Everything is a "reference" (if it isn't a simple "value type"), and is passed around as such, so referencing a child of an object is always done with dot notation.