I'm trying to work over big files using Haskell. I'd like to browse an input file byte after byte, and to generate an output byte after byte. Of course I need the IO to be buffered with blocks of reasonable size (a few KB). I can't do it, and I need your help please.
import System
import qualified Data.ByteString.Lazy as BL
import Data.Word
import Data.List
main :: IO ()
main =
do
args <- System.getArgs
let filename = head args
byteString <- BL.readFile filename
let wordsList = BL.unpack byteString
let foldFun acc word = doSomeStuff word : acc
let wordsListCopy = foldl' foldFun [] wordsList
let byteStringCopy = BL.pack (reverse wordsListCopy)
BL.writeFile (filename ++ ".cpy") byteStringCopy
where
doSomeStuff = id
I name 开发者_C百科this file TestCopy.hs
, then do the following:
$ ls -l *MB
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10000000 2011-03-24 13:11 10MB
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 5000000 2011-03-24 13:31 5MB
$ ghc --make -O TestCopy.hs
[1 of 1] Compiling Main ( TestCopy.hs, TestCopy.o )
Linking TestCopy ...
$ time ./TestCopy 5MB
real 0m5.631s
user 0m1.972s
sys 0m2.488s
$ diff 5MB 5MB.cpy
$ time ./TestCopy 10MB
real 3m6.671s
user 0m3.404s
sys 1m21.649s
$ diff 10MB 10MB.cpy
$ time ./TestCopy 10MB +RTS -K500M -RTS
real 2m50.261s
user 0m3.808s
sys 1m13.849s
$ diff 10MB 10MB.cpy
$
My problem: There is a huge difference between a 5MB and a 10 MB file. I'd like the performances to be linear in the size of the input file. Please what am i doing wrong, and how can I achieve this? I don't mind using lazy bytestrings or anything else as long as it works, but it has to be a standard ghc library.
Precision: It's for a university project. And I'm not trying to copy files. The doSomeStuff
function shall perform compression/decompression actions that I have to customize.
For chunked input processing I would use the enumerator package.
import Data.Enumerator
import Data.Enumerator.Binary (enumFile)
We use bytestrings
import Data.ByteString as BS
and IO
import Control.Monad.Trans (liftIO)
import Control.Monad (mapM_)
import System (getArgs)
Your main function could look like following:
main =
do (filepath:_) <- getArgs
let destination
run_ $ enumFile filepath $$ writeFile (filepath ++ ".cpy")
enumFile reads 4096 bytes per chunk and passes these to writeFile, which writes it down.
enumWrite is defined as:
enumWrite :: FilePath -> Iteratee BS.ByteString IO ()
enumWrite filepath =
do liftIO (BS.writeFile filepath BS.empty) -- ensure the destination is empty
continue step
where
step (Chunks xs) =
do liftIO (mapM_ (BS.appendFile filepath) xs)
continue step
step EOF = yield () EOF
As you can see, the step function takes chunks of bytestrings and appends them to the destination file. These chunks have the type Stream BS.Bytestring, where Stream is defined as:
data Stream a = Chunks [a] | EOF
On an EOF step terminates, yielding ().
To have a much more elaborate read on this I personally recommend Michael Snoymans tutorial
The numbers
$ time ./TestCopy 5MB
./TestCopy 5MB 2,91s user 0,32s system 96% cpu 3,356 total
$ time ./TestCopy2 5MB
./TestCopy2 5MB 0,04s user 0,03s system 93% cpu 0,075 total
That's quite an improvement. Now in order to implement your fold you probably want to write an Enumeratee, which is used to transform a input stream. Fortunately there is already a map function defined in the enumerator package, which can be modified for your need, i.e. it can be modified to carry over state.
On the construction of the intermediate result
You construct wordsList in reverse order and reverse it afterwards. I think difference lists do a better job, because appends take only O(1) time due to the fact that appending is only a function composition. I'm not sure whether they takes more space though. Here's a rough sketch of difference lists:
type DList a = [a] -> [a]
emptyList :: DList a
emptyList = id
snoc :: DList a -> a -> DList a
snoc dlist a = dlist . (a:)
toList :: DList a -> [a]
toList dlist = dlist []
This answer is probably not needed anymore, but I added it for completeness.
I take it this is a follow on to Reading large file in haskell? from yesterday.
Try compiling with "-rtsopts -O2" instead of just "-O".
You claim "I'd like to browse an input file byte after byte, and to generate an output byte after byte." but your code reads the entire input before trying to create any output. This is just not very representative of the goal.
With my system I see "ghc -rtsopts --make -O2 b.hs" giving
(! 741)-> time ./b five
real 0m2.789s user 0m2.235s sys 0m0.518s
(! 742)-> time ./b ten
real 0m5.830s user 0m4.623s sys 0m1.027s
Which now looks linear to me.
精彩评论