I'm am using NHibernate.Search
and Lucene.Net
. I will ask if anyone have experienced similar problems. This is the situation regarding the followin开发者_JAVA百科g three classes.
[Indexed]
public class File
{
[Field]
public virtual string FileId { get; private set; }
[ContainedIn]
public virtual List<Record> Records { get; private set; }
}
[Indexed]
public class CaseFile : File
{
[Field]
public virtual int CaseYear { get; set; }
[Field]
public virtual int CaseSequenceNumber { get; set; }
}
[Indexed]
public class Record
{
[IndexedEmbedded]
public virtual File ParentFile { get; set; }
}
The problem is when I try to index the record class. The goal is to get all fields of both the File
class and the subclass CaseFile
contained in the Record
index. But when I index the Record
class I only get fields of the File
superclass in my Record index. The fields of the CaseFile
subclass are missing in the Record index.
I have also tried the [IndexedEmbedded(TargetElement = typeof(CaseFile))]
on the ParentFile
property in the Record
class, but this leads to totally empty indexes, or no indexing at all.
If I index the File class, the expected subclass properties are indexed as expected in the File
index.
Have anyone experienced similar problems with Hibernate/NHibernate
search?
I was having the same issue, and I managed to achieve a workaround by doing something similar to the following.
It's not the nicest solution though.
[Indexed]
public class File
{
[Field]
public virtual string FileId { get; private set; }
[ContainedIn]
public virtual List<Record> Records { get; private set; }
[Field(Index.Tokenized, Store = Store.Yes)]
public virtual string CaseYearSearch
{
get
{
if(GetType() == typeof(CaseFile))
{
return ((CaseFile)this).CaseYear;
}
return "";
}
}
[Field(Index.Tokenized, Store = Store.Yes)]
public virtual string CaseSequenceNumberSearch
{
get
{
if(GetType() == typeof(CaseFile))
{
return ((CaseFile)this).CaseSequenceNumber;
}
return "";
}
}
}
public class CaseFile : File
{
public virtual int CaseYear { get; set; }
public virtual int CaseSequenceNumber { get; set; }
}
[Indexed]
public class Record
{
[IndexedEmbedded]
public virtual File ParentFile { get; set; }
}
I'm using a MultiFieldQueryParser to query.
IFullTextSession session = Search.CreateFullTextSession(Session);
var parser = new MultiFieldQueryParser(new[] { "File.CaseYearSearch", "File.CaseSequenceNumberSearch" }, new CustomAnalyzer());
parser.SetDefaultOperator(QueryParser.Operator.OR);
var booleanQuery = new BooleanQuery();
booleanQuery.Add(parser.Parse(terms), BooleanClause.Occur.MUST);
booleanQuery.Add(new TermQuery(new Term("Status", ((int)Status.Active).ToString())), BooleanClause.Occur.MUST);
return session.CreateFullTextQuery(booleanQuery, new[] { typeof(Record) });
Let me know if you find a cleaner solution.
I discussed the problem with Hibernate/NHibernate search and they confirmed that the situation is a bug.
They recommended using a custom class bridge to add the missing fields to the index I wanted it to be in.
This was much cleaner and I was satisified with this soluion until the source in Hibernate/NHibernate search is fixed.
精彩评论