开发者

C++ -- why should we define the pure virtual destructor outside the class definition?

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-02-16 14:40 出处:网络
class Object { public: ... virtual ~Object() = 0; ... }; Objec开发者_运维问答t::~Object() {} // Should we always define the pure virtual destructor outside?
class Object {
public:
  ...
  virtual ~Object() = 0;
  ...
};

Objec开发者_运维问答t::~Object() {} // Should we always define the pure virtual destructor outside?

Question: Should we always define the pure virtual destructor outside the class definition?

In other words, it is the reason that we should not define any virtual function inline?

Thank you


You can define virtual functions inline. You cannot define pure virtual functions inline.

The following syntax variants are simply not permitted:

virtual ~Foo() = 0 { }
virtual ~Foo() { } = 0;

But this is fully valid:

virtual ~Foo() { }

You must define a pure virtual destructor if you intend to instantiate it or subclasses, ref 12.4/7:

A destructor can be declared virtual (10.3) or pure virtual (10.4); if any objects of that class or any derived class are created in the program, the destructor shall be defined. If a class has a base class with a virtual destructor, its destructor (whether user- or implicitly- declared) is virtual.


A pure virtual function does not have an implementation by definition. It should be implemented by the sub-classes.

If you want to chain the destructor, just keep it virtual (non pure virtual).

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消