I am writing the a generic function for my website using jquery which would be used over the entire site for displaying a success/error message. I decided to make it a plug开发者_如何学Cin.
A simple form of the plugin is given below:
; (function ($) {
jQuery.FlashMessage=function(msg){
alert(msg);
}
})(jQuery);
I wanted to know whether it is a good practice to define plugins in the jquery namespace or should it defined under $.fn.XXXX ..or am i overthinking and it doesn't matter it at all.
You add those functions to jQuery.fn
which should be run on selected elements, e.g. $('div').yourFunction()
.
If you want a "generic" function, like $.ajax()
, then you should add it to the jQuery object, like you already do. But I would use $
inside the function:
(function ($) {
$.FlashMessage=function(msg){
alert(msg);
}
})(jQuery);
So it depends on what kind of functionality you want.
jQuery.fn
is equivalent to jQuery.prototype
with jQuery.fn.FlashMessage
you can do
jQuery.fn.FlashMessage=function(){
return this.each(function(){
//do some thing
});
});
//use like this, your chaining is secured
jQuery('#someElement').FlashMessage().DoSomeThingElse().SomethingMore();
if you are concerned is modifying only one element than why to use jQuery.FlashMessage
, do it like myNameSpace.FlashMessage
Typically plugins on the fn namspace return a jQuery object to maintain chainability. Also they are applied to jQuery.prototype
so all jQuery objects can call it.
Check out this page for a very good overview on plugin authoring: http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Authoring
精彩评论