A
and B
where there is a foreign key from A
to B
.
This generates, by default, a POJO for A
which has B
as a member (开发者_开发问答its "parent") and a POJO for B
which has a Set<A>
as a member (its "children").
What I'd like is to know how I can control the rev-eng so that only one side of the association is created (I have different use cases so basically all three options are important for me).
I do not want to use hbm.xml files as I'm working with annotations and JPA2.0 but I can specify some metadata on the reverse engineering process to hibernate via hibernae.reveng.xml
I've tried configuring the foreign-key
attribute and defining there the exclude=true
but that only provided me with a half an answer for one scenario. That generated an A
POJO with a bPK int member which is tolerable and understandable but the generated POJO of B
now does not compile as the one-to-many
annotation has an invalid attribute; The mappedby="unresolved"
due to the fact that A
no longer has a property which hibernate reveng can map back to.
So, I currently cannot create uni-directional associations and I'd appreciate any help.
Create a class for reveng. strategy
at Hibernate Code Generation Configuration
Example :
public class MyReverseEngineeringStrategy extends DelegatingReverseEngineeringStrategy {
public MyReverseEngineeringStrategy(ReverseEngineeringStrategy delegate) {
super(delegate);
}
@Override
public void setSettings(ReverseEngineeringSettings settings) {
super.setSettings(settings);
}
@Override
public boolean excludeForeignKeyAsCollection(String keyname,
TableIdentifier fromTable, java.util.List fromColumns,
TableIdentifier referencedTable, java.util.List referencedColumns) {
// TODO : Your work here
if (keyname.equals("___") &&
fromTable.getName().equals("___") &&
fromColumns.contains("___") &&
referencedTable.getName().equals("___") &&
referencedColumns.contains("___")) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
JavaDoc for method excludeForeignKeyAsCollection
Should this foreignkey be excluded as a oneToMany
and there also have another method call excludeForeignKeyAsManytoOne
Should this foreignkey be excluded as a many-to-one
Currently (tested with Hibernate Tools 5.2), generating unidirectional many-to-one works.
In the documentation (https://docs.jboss.org/tools/4.0.0.Final/en/hibernatetools/html_single/index.html#hibernaterevengxmlfile), you can see that you can exclude some side of the relationship :
For example (renaming properties)
<!-- control many-to-one and set names for a specific named foreign key constraint -->
<foreign-key constraint-name="ORDER_CUST">
<many-to-one property="customer"/>
<set property="orders"/>
</foreign-key>
Or (excluding properties)
<!-- can also control a pure (shared pk) one-to-one -->
<foreign-key constraint-name="ADDRESS_PERSON">
<one-to-one exclude="false"/>
<inverse-one-to-one exclude="true"/>
</foreign-key>
So to have just one side of the relationship with @ManyToOne only, you could do the following :
<table name="city" schema="public">
<primary-key property="id">
<key-column name="id" type="integer"/>
</primary-key>
</table>
<table name="country" schema="public">
<foreign-key constraint-name="country_capital_fkey" foreign-schema="public">
<many-to-one property="capital" exclude="false"/>
<set exclude="true" />
</foreign-key>
</table>
You can also fetch an instance of my sample database with Docker here :
docker pull ghusta/postgres-world-db:2.1
精彩评论