开发者

Define string array

开发者 https://www.devze.com 2023-02-12 22:24 出处:网络
I would like to define an array of string like tha开发者_JAVA技巧t: #define sup (const char**) (\"string1\", \"string2\")

I would like to define an array of string like tha开发者_JAVA技巧t:

#define sup (const char**) ("string1", "string2")

but it fails when I try to print the first string:

printf("The string: %s\n",sup[0]); 

how to do it in the proper way?


I would advice against doing this with macros altogether, but if you are really interested in what is going on with the code --more than in how this should actually be tackled, here is an explanation.

There is a simple issue in the code, and a more obscure one. The very simple is that to declare an array you don't use parenthesis but rather curly braces:

#define sup (const char**){"str1", "str2"} // still wrong!!

The less simple issue is that arrays are not pointers. The curly brace initializer can be used to initialize an array of two const char*, but that is not the same as a const char**. If you change the code to:

#define sup (const char*[2]){"str1", "str2" }

It should work.

What is going on under the hood with the previous version? Well, the compiler is seeing the declaration of a pointer (well, casting to a pointer) and the initializer. It is assuming that you want to initialize the pointer with the first element (incompatible pointer, but the cast is explicit... you must know what you want if you forced the cast), and then ignore the remainder. Basically the compiler translates your code to [*]:

#define sup (const char**)"str1"

And that will cause havoc at runtime. It is interesting to note that if you had used a proper variable and then initialized the pointer with it, it would have worked, because while arrays are not pointers (I insist, keep that in mind) arrays do decay into pointers:

const char* tmp[] = { "hi", "there" };
const char** sup = tmp;              // fine, tmp decays into &tmp[0]

[*] There's a bit of handwaving there... the compiler translates the code, once inserted at the place of use of the macro by the preprocessor, but the translation is equivalent to what I wrote if you were to edit the macro manually.


I think that doing this kind of preprocessor tricks, especially with arrays, isn't such a good idea. You should instead have a real global string table, like this:

const char const * sup[]={"String 1", "String 2", "String 3"};

in one of the .c files, and put its extern declaration in a header to be included wherever such strings are needed:

extern const char const * sup[];

(the first const is to avoid modifications to each string literal - which is UB -, the second to avoid replacing the pointers stored in sup; if you want to allow this last action, remove the second const)

An alternative approach would be to define sup directly in the header as a static global variable (i.e. with internal linkage); I've seen this done before with integer constants to make sure they are immediately known to the compiler in every translation unit (so it can put them as immediate values in the generated assembly), but I don't think that with string pointers it can give any significant performance boost.


I have a header that is common to all my projects.

#define MAX_STUDENTS 3
char STUDENT[] = { "Manny", "Joe", "Jack" };

The code looks like:

for( int i=0; i<MAX_STUDENTS; i++ )
{ Do Something with STUDENT[i]; }

Claude

0

精彩评论

暂无评论...
验证码 换一张
取 消