I'm working on a patch to submit to the Registration Code module for Drupal. In short, is there a more efficient way to write the code below?
if (module_exists('regcode_voucher')) {
$cnfg = variable_get('regcode_voucher_display', array('regform' => 'regform'));
if (empty($cnfg['regform'])) {
return;
}
}
It seems like I should be able to reduce it to one if
statement with &a开发者_如何学Pythonmp;&
combining two conditions, but I haven't found the syntax or the necessary php array function that would allow me to do that.
In case some context helps, the regcode_voucher sub-module allows users to enter their registration code on the user edit page. On our sites, after a "beta" period, we want to simplify the registration form by removing the registration code field; but we'd like users to still be able to enter the code on their account edit page. The code above is part of a patch that allows the regcode's hook_user changes to be bypassed.
Code looks like good, what efficient do you want? Little changes may be:
if (module_exists('regcode_voucher')) {
$cnfg = variable_get('regcode_voucher_display', null);
if ($cnfg) {
// do your actions
}
}
And I don't recommend to merge if..., code should be clear and simpler to understand. If you merge these for optimizing, you win "tiny" milliseconds for real-live processors, but lost your clean code.
Why are you returning an array from variable_get if the variable is not found? variable_get will always return a string or a serialized array (that needs to be unserialized). If I'm missing something, you can use array_key_exists('regcode', variable_get(...)) to check for the array key.
This should work... note returning "false" from variable_get as a default if the variable is not found, which will cause the if conditions to not match. I personally find this more readable than nested if statements (for 3+ conditions I'd nest, though).
if( module_exists('regcode_voucher') && variable_get('regcode_voucher_display', false) ) {
// stuff
}
精彩评论